git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicolas Sebrecht <nicolas.s.dev@gmx.fr>
To: rhlee <richard@webdezign.co.uk>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Nicolas Sebrecht <nicolas.s.dev@gmx.fr>
Subject: Re: Working on merged branches whilst seeing current master
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 16:14:25 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091112151425.GD25398@vidovic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1258037862366-3993313.post@n2.nabble.com>

The 12/11/09, rhlee wrote:
> Nicolas Sebrecht-3 wrote:
> > 
> >>                                      Yes I know I probably should not be
> >> working like this. My branches should be wholly independent. But I doing
> >> web
> >> development not kernel development so there is much less modularity and
> >> branches/features have a tendency to creep into one another.
> > 
> > This should not be the case. Modularity in the release process and the
> > development strategy is not tied to "what I am developing". I'm doing
> > some web development too and have no difficulty around this point.
> 
> Just to clarify. Do you mean that this should not be the case that you get
> feature creep in branches or the fact that this happens does interfere with
> your release process/development strategy.

I mean that the independency of the feature branches is mostly relying
on "what do I (as a developer) commit in this branch", which is really
tied to "how to write nice atomic commits" (easily reversible, etc).

This must be applicable whatever the product/software you're working on
and it is applicable for web development too.

-- 
Nicolas Sebrecht

      reply	other threads:[~2009-11-12 15:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-11 17:16 Working on merged branches whilst seeing current master rhlee
2009-11-11 21:57 ` Nicolas Sebrecht
2009-11-12 12:48   ` Tim Mazid
2009-11-12 16:49     ` rhlee
2009-11-26 12:45       ` Tim Mazid
2009-11-12 14:57   ` rhlee
2009-11-12 15:14     ` Nicolas Sebrecht [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20091112151425.GD25398@vidovic \
    --to=nicolas.s.dev@gmx.fr \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=richard@webdezign.co.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).