From: Nicolas Sebrecht <nicolas.s.dev@gmx.fr>
To: rhlee <richard@webdezign.co.uk>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Nicolas Sebrecht <nicolas.s.dev@gmx.fr>
Subject: Re: Working on merged branches whilst seeing current master
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 16:14:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091112151425.GD25398@vidovic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1258037862366-3993313.post@n2.nabble.com>
The 12/11/09, rhlee wrote:
> Nicolas Sebrecht-3 wrote:
> >
> >> Yes I know I probably should not be
> >> working like this. My branches should be wholly independent. But I doing
> >> web
> >> development not kernel development so there is much less modularity and
> >> branches/features have a tendency to creep into one another.
> >
> > This should not be the case. Modularity in the release process and the
> > development strategy is not tied to "what I am developing". I'm doing
> > some web development too and have no difficulty around this point.
>
> Just to clarify. Do you mean that this should not be the case that you get
> feature creep in branches or the fact that this happens does interfere with
> your release process/development strategy.
I mean that the independency of the feature branches is mostly relying
on "what do I (as a developer) commit in this branch", which is really
tied to "how to write nice atomic commits" (easily reversible, etc).
This must be applicable whatever the product/software you're working on
and it is applicable for web development too.
--
Nicolas Sebrecht
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-12 15:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-11 17:16 Working on merged branches whilst seeing current master rhlee
2009-11-11 21:57 ` Nicolas Sebrecht
2009-11-12 12:48 ` Tim Mazid
2009-11-12 16:49 ` rhlee
2009-11-26 12:45 ` Tim Mazid
2009-11-12 14:57 ` rhlee
2009-11-12 15:14 ` Nicolas Sebrecht [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091112151425.GD25398@vidovic \
--to=nicolas.s.dev@gmx.fr \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=richard@webdezign.co.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).