git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
To: "Jan Krüger" <jk@jk.gs>
Cc: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>,
	Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke-list@xs4all.nl>,
	Tomas Carnecky <tom@dbservice.com>,
	git list <git@vger.kernel.org>,
	Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] git-pull.sh --rebase: overhaul error handling when no candidates are found
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 22:07:54 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091113040754.GA3255@progeny.tock> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091112170814.1858aba4@perceptron>

Jan Krüger wrote:

> Subject: [PATCH v2] git-pull.sh --rebase: overhaul error handling when no candidates are found

s/error handling/error message/. :)

> --- a/git-pull.sh
> +++ b/git-pull.sh
> @@ -91,45 +91,56 @@ error_on_no_merge_candidates () {
[...]
>  	if [ $# -gt 1 ]; then
> -		echo "There are no candidates for merging in the refs that you just fetched."
> +		echo "There are no candidates for using the refs that you just fetched."
>  		echo "Generally this means that you provided a wildcard refspec which had no"
>  		echo "matches on the remote end."

This sounds a little awkward to me, maybe because all the remote refs
are being used to populate the remotes/<remote>/* hierarchy.

I’m trying to come up with an alternative wording, but it is hard:

 * Merging and rebasing are about incorporating the remote history
   into our own, so how about something like "... no candidates for
   incorporating from the refs ..."?  

 * Maybe one is using 'git pull' to update.  "There are no
   candidates to use for an update among the refs that you just
   fetched."

 * Or: "There are no upstreams to local branches among the refs that
   you just fetched."

I like the third of these best, but I hope you can do better.

>  	elif [ $# -gt 0 ] && [ "$1" != "$remote" ]; then
>  		echo "You asked to pull from the remote '$1', but did not specify"
> -		echo "a branch to merge. Because this is not the default configured remote"
> +		echo "a branch to use. Because this is not the default configured remote"

Maybe just "... did not specify a branch."?

>  		echo "for your current branch, you must specify a branch on the command line."
>  	elif [ -z "$curr_branch" ]; then
>  		echo "You are not currently on a branch, so I cannot use any"
>  		echo "'branch.<branchname>.merge' in your configuration file."
> -		echo "Please specify which branch you want to merge on the command"
> +		echo "Please specify which branch you want to use on the command"

s/branch/remote branch/?  The reader might worry that the command is
going to try to re-attach his HEAD.

The rest of your patch looks good to me.  Thanks for working on this.

Jonathan

  reply	other threads:[~2009-11-13  3:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-11 13:22 Unhelpful "branch.master.remote = <nickname>" advice? Jan Nieuwenhuizen
2009-11-11 14:08 ` Tomas Carnecky
     [not found]   ` <1257965806.26362.132.camel@heerbeest>
2009-11-11 19:10     ` Tomas Carnecky
2009-11-11 19:34       ` Jan Nieuwenhuizen
2009-11-11 20:32         ` Tomas Carnecky
2009-11-12 14:17           ` Jan Nieuwenhuizen
2009-11-12 14:53             ` [PATCH] git-pull.sh: overhaul error handling when no candidates are found Jan Krüger
2009-11-12 15:06               ` Jeff King
2009-11-12 15:25                 ` Jan Krüger
2009-11-12 15:28                   ` Jeff King
2009-11-12 16:08                 ` [PATCH v2] git-pull.sh --rebase: " Jan Krüger
2009-11-13  4:07                   ` Jonathan Nieder [this message]
2009-11-27 14:17                     ` [PATCH] pull: clarify advice for the unconfigured error case Jonathan Nieder
2009-12-02 23:08                       ` Junio C Hamano
2009-12-03  1:26                         ` Jonathan Nieder
2009-12-03  1:43                           ` Jeff King
2009-12-03  8:49                             ` Jan Nieuwenhuizen
2009-12-03 10:51                         ` Jan Krüger
2009-12-07  0:29                           ` Junio C Hamano
2009-11-15  9:08                   ` [PATCH v2] git-pull.sh --rebase: overhaul error handling when no candidates are found Junio C Hamano
2009-11-12 14:56             ` Unhelpful "branch.master.remote = <nickname>" advice? Björn Steinbrink
2009-11-12 15:03             ` Tomas Carnecky
2009-11-18 12:29   ` [PATCH] Makefile: add uninstall target. Fixes elementary good cleaning manners Jan Nieuwenhuizen
2009-11-18 13:28     ` Matthieu Moy
2009-11-11 14:13 ` Unhelpful "branch.master.remote = <nickname>" advice? Jan Krüger
2009-11-11 19:54 ` Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20091113040754.GA3255@progeny.tock \
    --to=jrnieder@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=janneke-list@xs4all.nl \
    --cc=jk@jk.gs \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=tom@dbservice.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).