From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Petr Baudis Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] codeBeamer MR - Easy ACL for Git Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 08:47:02 +0100 Message-ID: <20091120074702.GW12890@machine.or.cz> References: <4B03B153.1020302@intland.com> <20091118120936.GL17748@machine.or.cz> <4B054D0A.5030802@intland.com> <2e24e5b90911192056t706071ble163a53741017ef@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Intland Software , git@vger.kernel.org To: Sitaram Chamarty X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Nov 20 08:47:14 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NBOD3-0000C6-M3 for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Fri, 20 Nov 2009 08:47:14 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755722AbZKTHrA (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Nov 2009 02:47:00 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755502AbZKTHrA (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Nov 2009 02:47:00 -0500 Received: from w241.dkm.cz ([62.24.88.241]:38409 "EHLO machine.or.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755447AbZKTHq7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Nov 2009 02:46:59 -0500 Received: by machine.or.cz (Postfix, from userid 2001) id D26CB86201E; Fri, 20 Nov 2009 08:47:02 +0100 (CET) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2e24e5b90911192056t706071ble163a53741017ef@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi! On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 10:26:32AM +0530, Sitaram Chamarty wrote: > On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 7:20 PM, Intland Software wrote: > > * MR against Gitolite > > Pretty much the same applies here as well. > > Conceptually, gitolite can do the roles stuff you mentioned, > if I understood it correctly. Of course, gitolite's access > config is in plain text. > > The web-based control, issue tracking, etc., are all on a > different plane from what gitosis/gitolite aim to be. So > much so that I might even disagree with Pasky on the need to > mention these two products in your website. I brought Gitosis/Gitolite up because I got the impression that MR was marketed primarily as a Git ACL tool, the other things being sort of mirror; maybe my impession was wrong, but I still think the comparison in ACL capabilities is useful. > You should stick to gitorious, github, and -- here's a new > one for you -- indefero. Hmm, I didn't even know about this one, thanks for the pointer. Looks like this suddenly is a very popular area. High competition is good! (BTW, if you don't care about wikis and issue tracking, but you do care about simplicity and light-weightness, you should best stick to Girocco! ;-) -- Petr "Pasky" Baudis A lot of people have my books on their bookshelves. That's the problem, they need to read them. -- Don Knuth