From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johan Herland Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCHv8 00/10] git notes Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 11:14:29 +0100 Message-ID: <200911201114.29331.johan@herland.net> References: <1258681154-2167-1-git-send-email-johan@herland.net> <7vk4xl5y3z.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, spearce@spearce.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Nov 20 11:15:24 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NBQWS-0002Ch-0p for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Fri, 20 Nov 2009 11:15:24 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751706AbZKTKPK (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Nov 2009 05:15:10 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751561AbZKTKPK (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Nov 2009 05:15:10 -0500 Received: from smtp.opera.com ([213.236.208.81]:47991 "EHLO smtp.opera.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751386AbZKTKPJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Nov 2009 05:15:09 -0500 Received: from johanh.eng.oslo.osa (pat-tdc.opera.com [213.236.208.22]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.opera.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id nAKADC6L024220 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 20 Nov 2009 10:13:18 GMT User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 In-Reply-To: <7vk4xl5y3z.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Friday 20 November 2009, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Johan Herland writes: > > Here is the 8th iteration of the git-notes series. > > Thanks. > > While I try my best not to break other people's patches while > applying, I prefer to see a re-rolled series based on the same commit > while replacing an existing series, unless the re-roll truly depends > on the newer base, so that people can more easily see what got > updated. Ah, I see. I was thinking I should do the rebase to resolve any conflicts before sending it to you, but I now see that - in the case where there are no conflicts - the non-rebased version is actually preferable. I will try to keep that in mind in the future. ...Johan -- Johan Herland, www.herland.net