From: Tay Ray Chuan <rctay89@gmail.com>
To: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Cc: Sverre Rabbelier <srabbelier@gmail.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org, "Shawn O. Pearce" <spearce@spearce.org>,
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] remote-curl.c: fix rpc_out()
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 01:54:15 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091124015415.c22d07c1.rctay89@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.00.0911231137170.4985@pacific.mpi-cbg.de>
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 6:39 PM, Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> wrote:
> I guess you meant "not be enough", as an int can hold a pretty large
> number until it turns negative.
I really did mean 'enough' - enough to trigger the use of chunked
encoding. I think the most important fix here is forcing rpc_out to
(according to curl) memcpy at most size_t max bytes (the removal of the
extraneous ';' addresses this). Pushing with chunked transfer would
fail with this extra semicolon.
Removing the possibility of a negative size_t was a preventive measure,
and, like you mentioned, requires a larger repository, so it's harder
to test for.
I probably should separate these issues into separate patches.
> So I think in this case it is more harm- than helpful to have a test case.
>
> For future reference: if you need a repository with special featurs
> for testing, it is best to generate it in a test script (see the many test
> cases labeled 'setup' in our test suite for examples).
Here's what I came up with: use the git repository which fetched the
test suite, and use the environment variable GIT_REMOTE_REFSPEC to specify
the remote refspec which the tester fetches git from.
if test -z "$GIT_REMOTE_REFSPEC"; then
say 'skipping test, the remote for git is not specified'
else
test_expect_success 'push with chunked encoding' '
OWD=$(pwd) &&
cd $TEST_DIRECTORY/../.git/ &&
REPO=$(pwd) &&
cd "$OWD" &&
echo "$REPO"/objects > .git/objects/info/alternates &&
git fetch "$REPO" "$GIT_REMOTE_REFSPEC"/*:refs/remotes/git/* &&
git push -v -v origin "refs/remotes/git/*:refs/remotes/git/*" \
>out 2>&1 &&
grep "POST git-receive-pack (chunked)" out
'
fi
Thoughts?
--
Cheers,
Ray Chuan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-23 17:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-23 3:03 [PATCH 2/2] remote-curl.c: fix rpc_out() Tay Ray Chuan
2009-11-23 5:53 ` Sverre Rabbelier
2009-11-23 8:38 ` Tay Ray Chuan
2009-11-23 10:39 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-11-23 17:54 ` Tay Ray Chuan [this message]
2009-11-23 21:04 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2009-11-24 1:35 ` Tay Ray Chuan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091124015415.c22d07c1.rctay89@gmail.com \
--to=rctay89@gmail.com \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=spearce@spearce.org \
--cc=srabbelier@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).