From: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <bebarino@gmail.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org, Martin Koegler <mkoegler@auto.tuwien.ac.at>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] gitweb: Make linking to actions requiring JavaScript a feature
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 16:41:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200911271641.40947.jnareb@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7vy6lsy9mi.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Fri, 27 Nov 2009, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > It might be however good *interim* solution, so people would be able
> > to test 'blame_incremental' view without having to edit gitweb links.
>
> Exactly. I thought you were responding to my earlier "ship it as a new
> feature with known breakage so that people can choose to enable to help
> debugging and fixing". If flipping on the new implementation makes an
> alternative working implementation unavailable, that would be one reason
> the site owners might consider _not_ enabling it. By making them both
> available, the result will have one less reason not to try for site
> owners.
Actually "addLinks" would be a bit harder, I guess, than current "fixLinks"
because "fixLinks" just adds ';js=1' to URL to denote that gitweb can use
JavaScript-requiring actions equivalents. For "addLinks" selecting where
to add links would have to be in gitweb.js
I can "borrow" some code from Martin Koegler patch from April 2007
"[PATCH 5/7] gitweb: Prototyp for selecting diffs in JavaScript"
Message-Id: <1176669971921-git-send-email-mkoegler@auto.tuwien.ac.at>
$gmane/44517/focus=44523.
Would turning
"blame"
link ito pair of links
"blame (incremental)"
be a good solution? I'm trying to come up with good naming for extra link
to 'blame_incremental' action...
--
Jakub Narebski
Poland
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-27 15:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-19 19:44 [PATCH 0/2] jn/gitweb-blame fixes Stephen Boyd
2009-11-19 19:44 ` [PATCH 1/2] gitweb.js: fix null object exception in initials calculation Stephen Boyd
2009-11-19 21:40 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-11-19 22:48 ` Stephen Boyd
2009-11-19 19:44 ` [PATCH 2/2] gitweb.js: use unicode encoding for nbsp instead of html entity Stephen Boyd
2009-11-19 23:00 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-11-20 1:00 ` Stephen Boyd
2009-11-25 3:51 ` [PATCHv2 2/2] gitweb.js: fix padLeftStr() and its usage Stephen Boyd
2009-11-19 23:05 ` [PATCH 0/2] jn/gitweb-blame fixes Jakub Narebski
2009-11-20 1:00 ` Stephen Boyd
2009-11-20 4:05 ` Stephen Boyd
2009-11-21 0:32 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-11-21 14:56 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-11-25 0:45 ` [PATCH] gitweb.js: Harden setting blamed commit info in incremental blame Jakub Narebski
2009-11-25 1:01 ` Nanako Shiraishi
2009-11-25 1:13 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-11-25 4:01 ` Stephen Boyd
2009-11-25 14:36 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-11-25 20:55 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-11-25 21:39 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-11-25 23:28 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-11-26 0:34 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-11-26 0:59 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-11-26 20:12 ` [RFC/PATCH] gitweb: Make linking to actions requiring JavaScript a feature Jakub Narebski
2009-11-26 20:34 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-11-26 21:24 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-11-27 2:39 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-11-27 15:41 ` Jakub Narebski [this message]
2009-11-27 18:29 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-12-01 1:18 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-12-01 16:51 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-12-01 16:52 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Jakub Narebski
2009-12-01 16:54 ` [PATCH 2/2] gitweb: Add link to other blame implementation in blame views Jakub Narebski
2009-12-07 1:04 ` [PATCH] gitweb.js: Harden setting blamed commit info in incremental blame Stephen Boyd
2009-12-07 1:19 ` Stephen Boyd
2009-12-08 16:29 ` PATCH/RFC] gitweb.js: Workaround for IE8 bug Jakub Narebski
2009-12-08 21:56 ` Stephen Boyd
2009-12-08 22:24 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-12-08 22:32 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-12-09 0:08 ` Stephen Boyd
2009-11-23 4:52 ` [PATCH 0/2] jn/gitweb-blame fixes Stephen Boyd
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200911271641.40947.jnareb@gmail.com \
--to=jnareb@gmail.com \
--cc=bebarino@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=mkoegler@auto.tuwien.ac.at \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).