From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [PATCH] grep: --full-tree Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 13:24:03 -0500 Message-ID: <20091129182402.GA21520@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <20091125214949.GA31473@coredump.intra.peff.net> <885649360911251412n3e566c8fu536b361b993f2ac6@mail.gmail.com> <20091125222037.GA2861@coredump.intra.peff.net> <885649360911260956p58c54a54rd887102c9adedcc9@mail.gmail.com> <20091127062013.GA20844@coredump.intra.peff.net> <20091127095914.GA4865@sigill.intra.peff.net> <7vpr73n7ns.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <20091127205004.GA26921@coredump.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Junio C Hamano , James Pickens , git@vger.kernel.org To: Johannes Schindelin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Nov 29 19:24:15 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NEoRS-000197-6T for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 19:24:14 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752425AbZK2SYC (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Nov 2009 13:24:02 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751895AbZK2SYB (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Nov 2009 13:24:01 -0500 Received: from peff.net ([208.65.91.99]:46469 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751455AbZK2SYA (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Nov 2009 13:24:00 -0500 Received: (qmail 7679 invoked by uid 107); 29 Nov 2009 18:28:32 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) (smtp-auth username relayok, mechanism cram-md5) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.40) with ESMTPA; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 13:28:32 -0500 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sun, 29 Nov 2009 13:24:03 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 11:21:06AM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > You continue to ignore that inconsistency -- even if it is introduced with > the best of all intentions -- is bad, bad, bad. > > But I guess that I continue to get ignored, Speaking of ignoring, you have never once responded to my repeated point that I agree that inconsistency is bad, but it is about weighing that bad against other bad things. -Peff