From: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <bebarino@gmail.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org, Martin Koegler <mkoegler@auto.tuwien.ac.at>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] gitweb: Make linking to actions requiring JavaScript a feature
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 17:51:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200912011751.12172.jnareb@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7v4oob8pap.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Tue, 1 Dec 2009, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
>
> > I had to step back a bit and ask myself what we are trying to achieve
> > here. When the current blame and incremental one are both working
> > perfectly and well, will there be a reason for the end users to choose
> > between them when they click?
> >
> > My answer is no. If the incremental one gives nicer user experience in
> > all cases, it will be shown without the non-incremental one; if the
> > incremental one makes the server or network load too heavy, a site owner
> > may decide to show only the non-incremental one.
> >
> > That makes my addLinks suggestion a change that would help _only_ while we
> > are working kinks out of the incremental one.
> >
> > Let's not waste too much effort doing that. Sorry for suggesting.
> >
> > Letting the site owner choose if the site wants to set the "incremental if
> > possible" boolean would be more than adequate, I think.
>
> Sorry, but I guess I dropped the ball after this message. If I understand
> correctly, the conclusion is that I can apply the patch in this one
>
> From: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
> Subject: [RFC/PATCH] gitweb: Make linking to actions requiring JavaScript a feature
> Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 21:12:15 +0100
> Message-ID: <200911262112.16280.jnareb@gmail.com>
>
> and shipping 1.6.6 with it (perhaps setting 'default' to '[0]' instead)
> would be both reasonably safe and allows easy experimentation by willing
> site owners (or individual gitweb deployment), right?
Yes, I think it is right.
As a followup to this mail I have sent modified version of patch mentioned
above, only with default setting for 'javascript-actions' changed to '[0]'
(disabled), and new patch adding link to 'blame_incremental' action in an
ordinary 'blame' view and vice versa, so even if 'javascript-actions' is
turned off one can experiment with AJAX-y blame.
gitweb/gitweb.perl | 21 +++++++++++++++++++--
1 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--
Jakub Narebski
Poland
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-01 16:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-19 19:44 [PATCH 0/2] jn/gitweb-blame fixes Stephen Boyd
2009-11-19 19:44 ` [PATCH 1/2] gitweb.js: fix null object exception in initials calculation Stephen Boyd
2009-11-19 21:40 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-11-19 22:48 ` Stephen Boyd
2009-11-19 19:44 ` [PATCH 2/2] gitweb.js: use unicode encoding for nbsp instead of html entity Stephen Boyd
2009-11-19 23:00 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-11-20 1:00 ` Stephen Boyd
2009-11-25 3:51 ` [PATCHv2 2/2] gitweb.js: fix padLeftStr() and its usage Stephen Boyd
2009-11-19 23:05 ` [PATCH 0/2] jn/gitweb-blame fixes Jakub Narebski
2009-11-20 1:00 ` Stephen Boyd
2009-11-20 4:05 ` Stephen Boyd
2009-11-21 0:32 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-11-21 14:56 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-11-25 0:45 ` [PATCH] gitweb.js: Harden setting blamed commit info in incremental blame Jakub Narebski
2009-11-25 1:01 ` Nanako Shiraishi
2009-11-25 1:13 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-11-25 4:01 ` Stephen Boyd
2009-11-25 14:36 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-11-25 20:55 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-11-25 21:39 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-11-25 23:28 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-11-26 0:34 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-11-26 0:59 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-11-26 20:12 ` [RFC/PATCH] gitweb: Make linking to actions requiring JavaScript a feature Jakub Narebski
2009-11-26 20:34 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-11-26 21:24 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-11-27 2:39 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-11-27 15:41 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-11-27 18:29 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-12-01 1:18 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-12-01 16:51 ` Jakub Narebski [this message]
2009-12-01 16:52 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Jakub Narebski
2009-12-01 16:54 ` [PATCH 2/2] gitweb: Add link to other blame implementation in blame views Jakub Narebski
2009-12-07 1:04 ` [PATCH] gitweb.js: Harden setting blamed commit info in incremental blame Stephen Boyd
2009-12-07 1:19 ` Stephen Boyd
2009-12-08 16:29 ` PATCH/RFC] gitweb.js: Workaround for IE8 bug Jakub Narebski
2009-12-08 21:56 ` Stephen Boyd
2009-12-08 22:24 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-12-08 22:32 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-12-09 0:08 ` Stephen Boyd
2009-11-23 4:52 ` [PATCH 0/2] jn/gitweb-blame fixes Stephen Boyd
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200912011751.12172.jnareb@gmail.com \
--to=jnareb@gmail.com \
--cc=bebarino@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=mkoegler@auto.tuwien.ac.at \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).