From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Document date formats accepted by parse_date() Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 17:42:06 -0500 Message-ID: <20091202224206.GC9691@coredump.intra.peff.net> References: <3d547f4e32c026efc76a7dfe1572da617714f8c9.1259791789.git.vmiklos@frugalware.org> <831fc8f48429d5a21e29d04760b46b2ddfcb7d80.1259791789.git.vmiklos@frugalware.org> <20091203073313.6117@nanako3.lavabit.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Miklos Vajna , Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org To: Nanako Shiraishi X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Dec 02 23:42:33 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NFxu3-0005M6-Nh for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 23:42:32 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755916AbZLBWmA (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Dec 2009 17:42:00 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754454AbZLBWl7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Dec 2009 17:41:59 -0500 Received: from peff.net ([208.65.91.99]:49648 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754618AbZLBWl7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Dec 2009 17:41:59 -0500 Received: (qmail 28423 invoked by uid 107); 2 Dec 2009 22:46:33 -0000 Received: from coredump.intra.peff.net (HELO coredump.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.2) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.40) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) SMTP; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 17:46:33 -0500 Received: by coredump.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 02 Dec 2009 17:42:06 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091203073313.6117@nanako3.lavabit.com> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 07:33:13AM +0900, Nanako Shiraishi wrote: > Is there something wrong with 'show'? > > nana.git% ./test-date show '2005-04-07T22:13:13' > 2005-04-07T22:13:13 -> 40 years ago No. It doesn't call parse_date, but instead accepts a time_t-like "seconds since epoch". I intentionally didn't use parse_date because I didn't want bugs in parse_date to affect 'show' output, to keep testing simple. -Peff