From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Git 1.6.5.4 Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 04:25:21 -0500 Message-ID: <20091203092521.GA3620@coredump.intra.peff.net> References: <7v638o76ra.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Dec 03 10:25:30 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NG7wH-0002BV-Nb for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Thu, 03 Dec 2009 10:25:30 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751471AbZLCJZQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Dec 2009 04:25:16 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751241AbZLCJZQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Dec 2009 04:25:16 -0500 Received: from peff.net ([208.65.91.99]:45383 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750821AbZLCJZP (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Dec 2009 04:25:15 -0500 Received: (qmail 12966 invoked by uid 107); 3 Dec 2009 09:29:49 -0000 Received: from coredump.intra.peff.net (HELO coredump.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.2) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.40) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) SMTP; Thu, 03 Dec 2009 04:29:49 -0500 Received: by coredump.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 03 Dec 2009 04:25:21 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7v638o76ra.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 01:21:13AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > * "git pack-objects --all-progress" is an option to ask progress output > from write-object phase _if_ progress output were to be produced, and > shouldn't have forced the progress output. Shouldn't this actually be --all-progress-implied? Nico's patch intentionally kept --all-progress with the same behavior. -Peff