From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul Mackerras Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Add gitk-git Hungarian translation Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 10:03:05 +1100 Message-ID: <20091213230305.GA8135@brick.ozlabs.ibm.com> References: <1258284204-17247-1-git-send-email-djszapi@archlinux.us> <19205.2740.244981.703612@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Laszlo Papp , git@vger.kernel.org To: Laszlo Papp X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Dec 14 00:04:27 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NJxUH-0003o7-Ug for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 00:04:26 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754653AbZLMXEW (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Dec 2009 18:04:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754633AbZLMXEW (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Dec 2009 18:04:22 -0500 Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.10.76.45]:52807 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754614AbZLMXEU (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Dec 2009 18:04:20 -0500 Received: by ozlabs.org (Postfix, from userid 1003) id 0DC47B6F2B; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 10:04:20 +1100 (EST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 07:30:21PM +0100, Laszlo Papp wrote: > This is the x. time (6. ?) when I try to get answer, can I count any > answer after more months ? What happens here, what's the reason for it > not be answered ? It's a new translation that could help git project, > Why didn't I get any response ? But if this is the general situation I > need to ignore my dream to contribute more in git project... :( Actually, I thought I had put it in. In any case, a gentle reminder would suffice, you don't have to whinge about it. Re-posting the patch cleanly with a nice clear stand-alone patch description (without distractions such as unnecessary "Re:" or incorrect "[PATCH 2/2]" in the subject) is very helpful and is probably the best way to get your patch noticed. In any case, your patch has problems: I applied it and then ran make to update the message catalogs, and I got these errors: Generating catalog po/hu.msg msgfmt --statistics --tcl po/hu.po -l hu -d po/ po/hu.po:41: end-of-line within string po/hu.po:41:4: syntax error po/hu.po:42: end-of-line within string po/hu.po:666: end-of-line within string po/hu.po:666:10: syntax error po/hu.po:667: end-of-line within string msgfmt: found 6 fatal errors make: *** [po/hu.msg] Error 1 so I reverted it. Paul.