From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: Branch shuffling after 1.6.6 release plans Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 03:01:24 -0500 Message-ID: <20091226080124.GA10337@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <7vpr65kwnt.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <7vljgrgar9.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <200912251230.48243.trast@student.ethz.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org To: Thomas Rast X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Dec 26 09:03:00 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NORc3-0002pt-BC for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Sat, 26 Dec 2009 09:02:59 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751278AbZLZIB1 (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 Dec 2009 03:01:27 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751115AbZLZIB1 (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 Dec 2009 03:01:27 -0500 Received: from peff.net ([208.65.91.99]:46587 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751089AbZLZIB1 (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 Dec 2009 03:01:27 -0500 Received: (qmail 14509 invoked by uid 107); 26 Dec 2009 08:06:06 -0000 Received: from c-71-206-170-120.hsd1.va.comcast.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (71.206.170.120) (smtp-auth username relayok, mechanism cram-md5) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.40) with ESMTPA; Sat, 26 Dec 2009 03:06:06 -0500 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 26 Dec 2009 03:01:24 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200912251230.48243.trast@student.ethz.ch> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Fri, Dec 25, 2009 at 12:30:34PM +0100, Thomas Rast wrote: > > * tr/reset-checkout-patch (2009-11-19) 1 commit > > - {checkout,reset} -p: make patch direction configurable > > > > I do not particularly like a configuration like this that changes the > > behaviour of a command in a drastic way---it will make helping others > > much harder. > > I think it's not quite as drastic as you make it sound ;-) > > But I don't need this feature, and Peff mentioned something about > being happy except for the patch editing mode. Unfortunately the > above pretty much hits the limits of add--interactive's flexibility, > so an interactive direction toggling feature would need some rewiring. Let's drop it for now. I'm reasonably happy, and I don't want to waste your time trying to do something more invasive. And I haven't seen any evidence that anybody else is dissatisfied with what's in master. -Peff