From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nanako Shiraishi Subject: Re: [PATCH] pull: refuse complete src:dst fetchspec arguments Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 20:05:13 +0900 Message-ID: <20091229200513.6117@nanako3.lavabit.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Thomas Rast , To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Dec 29 12:05:35 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NPZtJ-0001O2-Sa for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Tue, 29 Dec 2009 12:05:30 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752765AbZL2LFS (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Dec 2009 06:05:18 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752763AbZL2LFR (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Dec 2009 06:05:17 -0500 Received: from karen.lavabit.com ([72.249.41.33]:38996 "EHLO karen.lavabit.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752683AbZL2LFQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Dec 2009 06:05:16 -0500 Received: from b.earth.lavabit.com (b.earth.lavabit.com [192.168.111.11]) by karen.lavabit.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E48F11B8BA; Tue, 29 Dec 2009 05:05:16 -0600 (CST) Received: from 4391.lavabit.com (212.62.97.20) by lavabit.com with ESMTP id 0VT56T9DX3EJ; Tue, 29 Dec 2009 05:05:16 -0600 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lavabit; d=lavabit.com; b=sIr233a8ydJ+3ci873bbTqlhC2Rvt3UQzI7Su0OTwwK+Gw4KcNqFv7oUvqXJP9dmz8rGhDaqpE3K674fER8Ejr7ifkcaNt6Nnxsyr2R0Yieop9GmYsuL13J2tNG4HO5a0/00NCMpAJONDvM9UMakXcMGj2h50pr5A0awau1me8o=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Date:Message-Id; In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Junio, could you tell us what happened to this thread? The patch rejects "git pull repo A:B" because it is almost always a mistake; I think it makes sense.