From: Nicolas Sebrecht <nicolas.s.dev@gmx.fr>
To: Nanako Shiraishi <nanako3@lavabit.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Nicolas Sebrecht <nicolas.s.dev@gmx.fr>
Subject: Re: Question about 'branch -d' safety
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 23:31:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091229223123.GA12965@vidovic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091230065442.6117@nanako3.lavabit.com>
The 30/12/09, Nanako Shiraishi wrote:
> I think the safety feature should check if the branch to be deleted is merged to the remote tracking branch it was forked from, instead of checking the current branch.
>
> What do you think?
I think we shouldn't. At first, every repository don't have a remote.
This may easily be passed by a "double check" with a logical OR between
the two statements.
But even with it, we would hit some foreign workflow. Think: Bob
directly push to Alice and Alice does the same to Bob. I don't use this
kind of workflow myself but I consider them to be sensible enough to
have our attention.
Now, I'm talking about what users may expect from the default behaviour.
I'm not against a new configuration variable. It would certainly give
more granularity to the expectation of "what is safe for me".
--
Nicolas Sebrecht
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-29 22:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-29 21:54 Question about 'branch -d' safety Nanako Shiraishi
2009-12-29 22:31 ` Nicolas Sebrecht [this message]
2009-12-30 3:12 ` Nanako Shiraishi
2009-12-30 6:43 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-12-30 21:08 ` Nicolas Sebrecht
2010-07-10 6:55 ` Clemens Buchacher
2010-07-10 21:40 ` Jonathan Nieder
2010-07-10 21:57 ` Jakub Narebski
2010-07-10 22:17 ` Jonathan Nieder
2010-07-11 6:55 ` Clemens Buchacher
2010-07-11 7:16 ` Jakub Narebski
2010-07-11 8:48 ` Julian Phillips
2010-07-11 13:37 ` Clemens Buchacher
2010-07-11 18:41 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-07-11 19:05 ` Jakub Narebski
2010-07-11 22:02 ` Will Palmer
2010-07-12 18:47 ` Clemens Buchacher
2010-07-12 23:50 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-07-13 7:13 ` Clemens Buchacher
2010-07-13 8:00 ` Will Palmer
2010-07-13 8:30 ` Johannes Sixt
2010-07-13 9:00 ` Will Palmer
2010-07-13 22:21 ` Clemens Buchacher
2010-07-17 9:30 ` Clemens Buchacher
2010-07-18 0:43 ` Jonathan Nieder
2010-07-18 11:55 ` Jakub Narebski
2010-07-18 20:27 ` Will Palmer
2010-07-18 23:19 ` Jakub Narebski
2010-07-19 7:12 ` Will Palmer
2010-07-19 11:01 ` Jakub Narebski
2010-07-19 17:16 ` Joshua Jensen
2010-07-19 19:34 ` Clemens Buchacher
2010-07-19 19:45 ` Will Palmer
2010-07-19 20:40 ` Jakub Narebski
2010-07-20 3:05 ` Joshua Jensen
2010-07-20 6:31 ` Will Palmer
2010-07-19 20:36 ` Jakub Narebski
2010-07-19 18:06 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-07-19 19:22 ` Clemens Buchacher
2010-07-19 20:49 ` Jakub Narebski
2010-07-20 13:19 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2010-07-20 13:34 ` Matthieu Moy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091229223123.GA12965@vidovic \
--to=nicolas.s.dev@gmx.fr \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nanako3@lavabit.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).