git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* signing tags: user.name assumed to be gpg uid?
@ 2009-12-29 20:36 Peter Vereshagin
  2009-12-29 21:12 ` Junio C Hamano
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Peter Vereshagin @ 2009-12-29 20:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: git

Como esta, git?

I notice that after I init and config user.name and user.email the user.comment gets taken from ~/.gpg automatically. Is it a correct behaviour?
And, when I try
git tag v0.1 -s
I get :
===
gpg: skipped "Peter Vereshagin <peter@vereshagin.org>": secret key not available
===
and this is because I need to config user.name with the gpg comment: when I 
===
git config --global user.name "Peter Vereshagin (http://vereshagin.org)"
===
the git tag signs well. But is it a correct behaviour to need the comment as a user's name? On key editing the gpg makes difference between (N)ame and (C)omment by far.

73! Peter pgp: A0E26627 (4A42 6841 2871 5EA7 52AB  12F8 0CE1 4AAC A0E2 6627)
-- 
http://vereshagin.org

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2009-12-30 10:47 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-12-29 20:36 signing tags: user.name assumed to be gpg uid? Peter Vereshagin
2009-12-29 21:12 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-12-30 10:47   ` Peter Vereshagin

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).