From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net>,
Jon Schewe <jpschewe@mtu.net>,
spearce@spearce.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] ls-files: fix overeager pathspec optimization
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 11:33:11 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100112163311.GD25092@coredump.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1263022535-12822-4-git-send-email-gitster@pobox.com>
On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 11:35:35PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> This patch changes the optimization so that it notices when the common
> prefix directory that it starts reading from is an ignored one.
Having just produced the similar but more ugly and messy patch earlier
in the thread, this series looks right to me.
-Peff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-12 16:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-08 15:17 Possible bug in git-completion.sh Jon Schewe
2010-01-08 15:40 ` Michael J Gruber
2010-01-08 16:24 ` Jeff King
2010-01-08 16:38 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-01-08 16:41 ` Jeff King
2010-01-08 16:45 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-01-08 16:56 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-01-08 17:24 ` Jeff King
2010-01-08 17:21 ` Jeff King
2010-01-08 18:21 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-01-08 19:58 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-01-08 23:01 ` [PATCH] ls-files: fix overeager pathspec optimization Junio C Hamano
2010-01-08 23:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-01-08 23:31 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-01-09 0:06 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-01-09 0:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-01-09 0:54 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-01-09 1:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-01-09 5:42 ` Jeff King
2010-01-09 7:16 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-01-09 7:35 ` [PATCH 1/4] t3001: test ls-files -o ignored/dir Junio C Hamano
2010-01-09 7:35 ` [PATCH 2/4] read_directory_recursive(): refactor handling of a single path into a separate function Junio C Hamano
2010-01-09 7:35 ` [PATCH 3/4] read_directory(): further split treat_path() Junio C Hamano
2010-01-09 7:35 ` [PATCH 4/4] ls-files: fix overeager pathspec optimization Junio C Hamano
2010-01-12 16:33 ` Jeff King [this message]
2010-01-09 8:07 ` [PATCH] " Junio C Hamano
2010-01-09 18:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-01-10 6:31 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100112163311.GD25092@coredump.intra.peff.net \
--to=peff@peff.net \
--cc=git@drmicha.warpmail.net \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=jpschewe@mtu.net \
--cc=spearce@spearce.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).