From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] strbuf_expand: convert "%%" to "%" Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 09:32:55 -0500 Message-ID: <20100114143255.GA15792@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <20100113173408.GA16652@coredump.intra.peff.net> <20100113173531.GA16786@coredump.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Junio C Hamano , Adam Megacz , git@vger.kernel.org To: Chris Johnsen X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Jan 14 15:33:12 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NVQkz-0002B6-EC for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 15:33:05 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752883Ab0ANOdC (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jan 2010 09:33:02 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751990Ab0ANOdA (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jan 2010 09:33:00 -0500 Received: from peff.net ([208.65.91.99]:54005 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751621Ab0ANOdA (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jan 2010 09:33:00 -0500 Received: (qmail 10456 invoked by uid 107); 14 Jan 2010 14:37:50 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) (smtp-auth username relayok, mechanism cram-md5) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.40) with ESMTPA; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 09:37:50 -0500 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 14 Jan 2010 09:32:56 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 05:47:09AM -0600, Chris Johnsen wrote: > On 2010 Jan 13, at 11:35, Jeff King wrote: > >Signed-off-by: Jeff King > > The patches of the v2 of this series (well, except "4/3") all use > this surprising, "extended" hostname in their Signed-off-by lines. I > suppose you unset user.email while testing the series and sent these > out before restoring your normal configuration. Heh. Yes, thank you for noticing. That is exactly what happened. Perhaps the next series should be a huge nag about implicit ident for S-o-b lines. ;) Junio, can you please fix up s/coredump.intra.// in your copies before pushing out? -Peff