From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nanako Shiraishi Subject: Re: [PATCH] git push --track Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 15:41:54 +0900 Message-ID: <20100114154154.6117@nanako3.lavabit.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: "Rudolf Polzer" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Jan 14 07:42:40 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NVJPj-0000Lo-B6 for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 07:42:39 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755823Ab0ANGmd (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jan 2010 01:42:33 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755603Ab0ANGmd (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jan 2010 01:42:33 -0500 Received: from karen.lavabit.com ([72.249.41.33]:48770 "EHLO karen.lavabit.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750753Ab0ANGmc (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jan 2010 01:42:32 -0500 Received: from b.earth.lavabit.com (b.earth.lavabit.com [192.168.111.11]) by karen.lavabit.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EBB311B8E6; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 00:42:32 -0600 (CST) Received: from 2992.lavabit.com (212.62.97.20) by lavabit.com with ESMTP id 5N1GX6BS1NF9; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 00:42:32 -0600 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lavabit; d=lavabit.com; b=ac/2OBlZUZVdG5lKYgv4UJZFQXRaIjodJEnThGDReVftalmIVjEtbmZSDqNToXFS5U6FNnZtrak7hirzOZaMR1nTAAwckEbSbg7U/oNOZ+Yc+B89+LFdtoPM7FTMJVQvo5XQ/lY0F49zqb/izu+6vdM+mqDDQ0PR5Nmqs28eMWY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Date:Message-Id; In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Quoting Rudolf Polzer > I'd like a feature to automatically "transform" a non-tracking local > branch into a tracking branch on push. A patch to do that is attached. How well does this take earlier discussions on the same topic into account? For example, did you study the design discussion in http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/135325/focus=135390 -- Nanako Shiraishi http://ivory.ap.teacup.com/nanako3/