From: Nicolas Sebrecht <nicolas.s.dev@gmx.fr>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: Nicolas Sebrecht <nicolas.s.dev@gmx.fr>,
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
Marko Poutiainen <regs@sofistes.net>,
git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Gitignore matching "git add" wildcard prevents operation
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 17:11:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100115161107.GC12982@vidovic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100115154816.GA1579@coredump.intra.peff.net>
The 15/01/10, Jeff King wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 04:34:19PM +0100, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
>
> > > 1. Most programs don't take their own globs. Without knowing that git
> > > can do so, there is no reason to discover it in this instance. I
> > > can see searching the manpage for options, but not for a discussion
> > > of globbing behavior.
> > >
> > > 2. They would have to know that using a git-glob will magically change
> > > the error-checking behavior.
> >
> > Not sure. This isn't a Git-particular issue.
> >
> > Users may hit this with a lot of other unix tools (sed, grep, find,
> > etc). So, we can expect either
> > they already know the issue;
> > or
> > they are discovering it using Git.
>
> I don't understand what you mean. How does "sed" do its own globbing of
> the command line?
Well, we are in the same dilemma as the other tools. The internal
globbing rules are explained in the related man page.
> > Most of the tools I talk about do have a manual section about globbing.
> > Users could learn globs with Git too and expect the same behaviour
> > somewhere else.
>
> Sure. git-add(1) talks about globbing, too
Oops, I was missing that; thanks.
> My complaint was more that as a user, I am not likely to see this
> problem and think "I'll bet git-specific globbing can solve it."
Yes. My point is that we are not talking about a Git specific issue.
What you're raising here is true whatever the command is. So, as long as
we clearly explain how 'git add' works, we are fine. Don't we?
> And
> when I look in the manual, I am more likely to look for a command-line
> option that helps me rather than to read all of the text
True. All I can see is to improve the man page with a dedicated section
"Globbing" instead of loosing it in a "random" place.
--
Nicolas Sebrecht
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-15 16:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-14 18:18 Gitignore matching "git add" wildcard prevents operation Marko Poutiainen
2010-01-14 19:52 ` Jeff King
2010-01-14 20:21 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-01-14 20:39 ` Jeff King
2010-01-15 15:34 ` Nicolas Sebrecht
2010-01-15 15:48 ` Jeff King
2010-01-15 16:11 ` Nicolas Sebrecht [this message]
2010-01-15 16:30 ` Jeff King
2010-01-15 18:06 ` Nicolas Sebrecht
2010-01-15 18:17 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-01-14 21:07 ` Marko Poutiainen
2010-01-15 15:39 ` Nicolas Sebrecht
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100115161107.GC12982@vidovic \
--to=nicolas.s.dev@gmx.fr \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
--cc=regs@sofistes.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).