From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Sixt Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 09/14] daemon: use run-command api for async serving Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 23:42:34 +0100 Message-ID: <201001152342.35081.j6t@kdbg.org> References: <1263591033-4992-1-git-send-email-kusmabite@gmail.com> <1263591033-4992-10-git-send-email-kusmabite@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: msysgit@googlegroups.com, git@vger.kernel.org, "Erik Faye-Lund" To: "Erik Faye-Lund" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Jan 15 23:43:39 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NVutG-0001gQ-NE for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Fri, 15 Jan 2010 23:43:39 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758512Ab0AOWnf (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Jan 2010 17:43:35 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758299Ab0AOWnf (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Jan 2010 17:43:35 -0500 Received: from bsmtp4.bon.at ([195.3.86.186]:51931 "EHLO bsmtp.bon.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758189Ab0AOWne (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Jan 2010 17:43:34 -0500 Received: from dx.sixt.local (unknown [93.83.142.38]) by bsmtp.bon.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id DED8110014; Fri, 15 Jan 2010 23:43:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dx.sixt.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30A1B19F5A6; Fri, 15 Jan 2010 23:42:35 +0100 (CET) User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 In-Reply-To: <1263591033-4992-10-git-send-email-kusmabite@gmail.com> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Freitag, 15. Januar 2010, Erik Faye-Lund wrote: > fork() is only available on POSIX, so to support git-daemon > on Windows we have to use something else. Conveniently > enough, we have an API for async operation already. I had a huh?-moment when I read this statement. This patch does not use what we call 'async', but start_command(). -- Hannes