From: "Adrián Ribao Martínez" <aribao@gmail.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Integration-Manager Workflow
Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2010 18:49:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201001161849.32211.aribao@gmail.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 1907 bytes --]
Hello everybody, I'm learning git since I'm planning moving from Bazaar.
I've been reading the documentation and the progit book, which is excellent.
I'm a bit confused In the chapter: http://progit.org/book/ch5-1.html#integrationmanager_workflow : "Integration-Manager Workflow"
I need to manages a project with several developers. Those developers are split into teams.
I'm planning these:
* A central repository using the http protocol. This central repository would be only writable by myself, it would have http access for the developers and ssh access for me.
* Every team would have ssh access to their repositories. i.e. team1.myserver.net, team2.myserver.net
* I want at least three branches: master, test, and develop. The path would be: develop(development version) -> test (beta) -> master (stable)
* I don't want any developer to write into the develop branch, and if they do by mistake, I don't want to take it into account.
My question is about the branches in the teams repositories. I want the developers to create feature/fix branches in their checkouts and when they have finished the work, I check and merge into develop if everything is OK.
Is the following procedure correct?:
1. They send me the path of the branch I should do: git checkout --track origin/feature1 (where origin could be: ssh://user@team1.myserver.net:/home/user/git/project)
2. If everything is ok I merge into development and remove branch feature1.
3. They fetch and the branch is deleted in their local checkouts, and the feature1 is in the develop branch: git pull origin
What happens if they accidentally work in the develop branch instead of creating a new one? What should we do?
I think I should never fetch from teamx.myserver.net to avoid this problem and instead track the branch like in step 2. Is this correct?
Thank you for your help, I'm a bit confused about git.
Regards,
Adrian Ribao
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2010-01-16 17:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-16 17:49 Adrián Ribao Martínez [this message]
2010-01-16 19:06 ` Integration-Manager Workflow Michael Poole
2010-01-16 19:47 ` Adrián Ribao Martínez
2010-01-17 2:53 ` Michael Poole
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201001161849.32211.aribao@gmail.com \
--to=aribao@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).