From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johan Herland Subject: Re: Dangerous new server status for deleted files Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 01:28:13 +0100 Message-ID: <201001210128.13772.johan@herland.net> References: <4B5764A6.30504@naughtydog.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Simon Hausmann , Junio C Hamano To: Pal-Kristian Engstad X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Jan 21 01:28:36 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NXkuY-0006bK-VU for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Thu, 21 Jan 2010 01:28:35 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754335Ab0AUA2V (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jan 2010 19:28:21 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751650Ab0AUA2R (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jan 2010 19:28:17 -0500 Received: from smtp.getmail.no ([84.208.15.66]:64430 "EHLO get-mta-out02.get.basefarm.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754805Ab0AUA2Q (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jan 2010 19:28:16 -0500 Received: from smtp.getmail.no ([10.5.16.4]) by get-mta-out02.get.basefarm.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7.0-0.04 64bit (built Jun 20 2008)) with ESMTP id <0KWK00FZUMN2A110@get-mta-out02.get.basefarm.net> for git@vger.kernel.org; Thu, 21 Jan 2010 01:28:14 +0100 (MET) Received: from alpha.localnet ([84.215.102.95]) by get-mta-in02.get.basefarm.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7.0-0.04 64bit (built Jun 20 2008)) with ESMTP id <0KWK00JJUMN1CA00@get-mta-in02.get.basefarm.net> for git@vger.kernel.org; Thu, 21 Jan 2010 01:28:14 +0100 (MET) X-PMX-Version: 5.5.3.366731, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.0.366912, Antispam-Data: 2010.1.21.1529 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.4 (Linux/2.6.32-ARCH; KDE/4.3.4; x86_64; ; ) In-reply-to: <4B5764A6.30504@naughtydog.com> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Wednesday 20 January 2010, Pal-Kristian Engstad wrote: > Our new Perforce server (P4D/NTX64/2009.2/228098 2009/12/16) seems to be > giving out 'move/delete' instead of the old 'delete' status for files > that are moved within the repo. Attached is the simple patch to fix it. > (By the way: How do you "sign off" a patch?) This is urgent, as it will > corrupt git repos trying to track a Perforce depot. Hi, and welcome to the Git community. The patch itself may be fine, but you should probably read Documentation/SubmittingPatches for hints on the customs of this list. For example: We prefer patches _inline_ in the mail, so that it's easier to review and comment on them. The Documentation/SubmittingPatches also explains what is meant by a sign-off, and how to sign-off your patches. Have fun! :) ...Johan -- Johan Herland, www.herland.net