From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johan Herland Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Jan 2010, #06; Wed, 20) Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 02:40:10 +0100 Message-ID: <201001210240.10522.johan@herland.net> References: <7vljfsxos5.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Junio C Hamano To: Sverre Rabbelier X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Jan 21 02:40:22 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NXm20-0003fY-MN for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Thu, 21 Jan 2010 02:40:21 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753862Ab0AUBkP (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jan 2010 20:40:15 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753399Ab0AUBkO (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jan 2010 20:40:14 -0500 Received: from smtp.getmail.no ([84.208.15.66]:63860 "EHLO get-mta-out01.get.basefarm.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753004Ab0AUBkN (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jan 2010 20:40:13 -0500 Received: from smtp.getmail.no ([10.5.16.4]) by get-mta-out01.get.basefarm.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7.0-0.04 64bit (built Jun 20 2008)) with ESMTP id <0KWK00GL3PYZMY80@get-mta-out01.get.basefarm.net> for git@vger.kernel.org; Thu, 21 Jan 2010 02:40:11 +0100 (MET) Received: from alpha.localnet ([84.215.102.95]) by get-mta-in02.get.basefarm.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7.0-0.04 64bit (built Jun 20 2008)) with ESMTP id <0KWK00J5XPYYCM10@get-mta-in02.get.basefarm.net> for git@vger.kernel.org; Thu, 21 Jan 2010 02:40:11 +0100 (MET) X-PMX-Version: 5.5.3.366731, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.0.366912, Antispam-Data: 2010.1.21.13032 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.4 (Linux/2.6.32-ARCH; KDE/4.3.4; x86_64; ; ) In-reply-to: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Thursday 21 January 2010, Sverre Rabbelier wrote: > On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 01:52, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > * jh/notes (2010-01-17) 23 commits > > [...] > > Updated with a re-roll. > > Just checking, you reverted all from next (with exception of the first > three), and now re-queued it to pu, with the first three still in > next? Or did I mis-remember and did only the first three make it to > next in the first place? You misremembered. Only the three first were merged to 'next'. Junio was about to merge the rest, but I asked him to hold until I had produced the current iteration. ...Johan -- Johan Herland, www.herland.net