From: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
To: Robin Rosenberg <robin.rosenberg@dewire.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Handle UNC paths everywhere
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 21:07:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201001252107.45745.j6t@kdbg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201001250155.47664.robin.rosenberg@dewire.com>
On Montag, 25. Januar 2010, Robin Rosenberg wrote:
> In Windows paths beginning with // are knows as UNC paths. They are
> absolute paths, usually referring to a shared resource on a server.
>
> Examples of legal UNC paths
>
> \\hub\repos\repo
> \\?\unc\hub\repos
> \\?\d:\repo
I agree that that the problem that you are addressing needs a solution.
However, the solution is not a whole-sale replacement of
have_dos_drive_prefix() by a function that is only a tiny bit fancier.
Accompanying changes are needed, and perhaps more code locations need change.
> @@ -648,7 +648,7 @@ int safe_create_leading_directories_const(const char
> *path);
> char *enter_repo(char *path, int strict);
> static inline int is_absolute_path(const char *path)
> {
> - return path[0] == '/' || has_dos_drive_prefix(path);
> + return path[0] == '/' || has_win32_abs_prefix(path);
Perhaps we need is_dir_sep(path[0]) here? But since I have not observed any
breakage in connection with this code, I think that all callers feed only
normalized paths (i.e. with forward slash). (Note that our getcwd()
implementation converts backslashes to forward slashes.) This means that a
full-fledged check is not needed.
> @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ char *gitbasename (char *path)
> {
> const char *base;
> /* Skip over the disk name in MSDOS pathnames. */
> - if (has_dos_drive_prefix(path))
> + if (has_win32_abs_prefix(path))
> path += 2;
This change is unnecessary; it really is only to skip an initial driver
prefix. If you want to support \\?\X: style paths, more work is needed here
so that you do not return X: or ? as the basename.
> +#define has_win32_abs_prefix(path) \
Do we really have to name everything "win32" when it is about Windows?
> @@ -535,7 +535,7 @@ struct child_process *git_connect(int fd[2], const char
> *url_orig,
> end = host;
>
> path = strchr(end, c);
> - if (path && !has_dos_drive_prefix(end)) {
> + if (path && !has_win32_abs_prefix(end)) {
This change is wrong because the check is really only about the drive prefix:
It checks that we do not mistake c:/foo as a ssh connection to host c,
path /foo. Yes, it does mean that on Windows we cannot have remotes to hosts
whose name consists only of a single letter using the rcp notation (you must
say ssh://c/foo if you mean it).
> @@ -409,7 +409,7 @@ int normalize_path_copy(char *dst, const char *src)
> {
> char *dst0;
>
> - if (has_dos_drive_prefix(src)) {
> + if (has_win32_abs_prefix(src)) {
> *dst++ = *src++;
> *dst++ = *src++;
> }
Is skipping just two characters for \\ or \\?\whatever paths the right thing?
> @@ -342,7 +342,7 @@ const char *setup_git_directory_gently(int *nongit_ok)
> die_errno("Unable to read current working directory");
>
> ceil_offset = longest_ancestor_length(cwd, env_ceiling_dirs);
> - if (ceil_offset < 0 && has_dos_drive_prefix(cwd))
> + if (ceil_offset < 0 && has_win32_abs_prefix(cwd))
> ceil_offset = 1;
I doubt that this is correct. The purpose of this check is that "c:/" is the
last directory that is checked (on Unix it would be "/") when path components
are stripped from cwd. For UNC paths this must be adjusted depending on how
you want to support \\server\share and \\?\c:\paths: You do not want to check
whether \\server\.git or \\.git or \\?\.git are git directories.
> --- a/transport.c
> +++ b/transport.c
> @@ -797,7 +797,7 @@ static int is_local(const char *url)
> const char *colon = strchr(url, ':');
> const char *slash = strchr(url, '/');
> return !colon || (slash && slash < colon) ||
> - has_dos_drive_prefix(url);
> + has_win32_abs_prefix(url);
This check is again to not mistake c:/foo as rcp style connection. No change
needed.
As I said, changes to other parts are perhaps also needed, most prominently,
make_relative_path() that prompted this patch. What about
make_absolute_path() and make_non_relative_path()?
-- Hannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-25 20:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-25 0:55 [PATCH] Handle UNC paths everywhere Robin Rosenberg
2010-01-25 9:36 ` Sverre Rabbelier
2010-01-25 9:58 ` Robin Rosenberg
2010-01-25 10:11 ` Erik Faye-Lund
2010-01-25 10:22 ` Sverre Rabbelier
2010-01-25 11:01 ` Robin Rosenberg
2010-01-25 11:06 ` Sverre Rabbelier
2010-01-25 11:17 ` Erik Faye-Lund
2010-01-25 17:34 ` Johannes Schindelin
2010-01-25 17:57 ` Erik Faye-Lund
2010-01-25 18:19 ` Johannes Schindelin
2010-01-25 19:45 ` Erik Faye-Lund
2010-01-25 19:37 ` Robin Rosenberg
2010-01-25 19:48 ` Erik Faye-Lund
2010-01-25 20:15 ` Robin Rosenberg
2010-01-25 19:45 ` Robin Rosenberg
2010-01-26 10:59 ` Johannes Schindelin
2010-01-25 20:04 ` Robin Rosenberg
2010-01-26 11:01 ` Johannes Schindelin
2010-01-25 20:07 ` Johannes Sixt [this message]
2010-01-25 21:42 ` Robin Rosenberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201001252107.45745.j6t@kdbg.org \
--to=j6t@kdbg.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=robin.rosenberg@dewire.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).