From: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
To: "J.H." <warthog9@kernel.org>
Cc: Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz>, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org, "J.H." <warthog9@eaglescrag.net>
Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Jan 2010, #08; Sun, 24)
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 01:59:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201001260159.09286.jnareb@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B5E357A.50607@kernel.org>
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 at 16:21:51 -0800 (PST), J.H. wrote:
> >
> > I am waiting for response from (I guess busy) J.H.; I can do the re-roll
> > if he is too busy to work on it.
>
> I'm juggling about 4 things in the air right now, with gitweb being one
> of them, and two of them involving external entities to kernel.org.
> It's good news all told, just requires a fair amount of my time
> (currently) and babysitting. I've been digging through the patches
> you've got right now. I should really just pull them in from your git
> tree again.
Note however that my series (gitweb/cache-kernel branch) is based on
gitweb-ml-v2, not on newer gitweb-ml-v5.
> After reading through some of the discussions today I've had some more
> ideas on the caching stuff, they are written up on my whiteboard and I
> might be able to get to shortly, but I've got a rather large wall
> looming ahead of me that's going to chew up a *LOT* (read at least a
> month, if not two) of my time, so I'm a bit under the gun to try and get
> this as far as I can before I hit that wall or this is going to fall by
> the wayside again till I've got time again.
I think the best way of utilizing your time would be for you to take
active part in discussion, especially in what git.kernel.org needs and why.
I can clean up the miscellaneous improvements parts myself, and re-roll
caching patches.
> > > For the main caching patch, it seems like good idea to take Jakub's
> > > split-up series instead, let's see what is J.H.'s opinion on the series?
> > >
> >
> > Let me at least make them into proper patches, with commit messages and
> > configureability at least of the original caching patch by J.H.
> >
> > Also the question whether to create 'print -> print $out' patch, or to
> > manipulate *STDOUT instead must be solved, I think, before applying
> > those patches... well, at least beyond 'pu'.
> >
> > I am waiting for promised J.H. comments, when he will have time for it...
--
Jakub Narebski
Poland
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-26 0:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-25 4:39 What's cooking in git.git (Jan 2010, #08; Sun, 24) Junio C Hamano
2010-01-25 18:29 ` Issues that need to be resolved before 1.7.0-rc1 Junio C Hamano
2010-01-25 21:17 ` Johannes Sixt
2010-01-25 22:43 ` What's cooking in git.git (Jan 2010, #08; Sun, 24) Jakub Narebski
2010-01-25 23:12 ` Petr Baudis
2010-01-25 23:47 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-01-26 0:07 ` Jakub Narebski
2010-01-26 0:21 ` J.H.
2010-01-26 0:59 ` Jakub Narebski [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201001260159.09286.jnareb@gmail.com \
--to=jnareb@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=pasky@suse.cz \
--cc=warthog9@eaglescrag.net \
--cc=warthog9@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).