From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Stephen R. van den Berg" Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Fix various integer overflows Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 09:59:52 +0100 Message-ID: <20100127085952.GA21535@cuci.nl> References: <1264530255-4682-1-git-send-email-ilari.liusvaara@elisanet.fi> <7vk4v4zlhg.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Ilari Liusvaara , git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Jan 27 10:10:27 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Na3ut-0004VD-EA for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 10:10:27 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752759Ab0A0JKW (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Jan 2010 04:10:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752588Ab0A0JKW (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Jan 2010 04:10:22 -0500 Received: from aristoteles.cuci.nl ([212.125.128.18]:36832 "EHLO aristoteles.cuci.nl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751298Ab0A0JKV (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Jan 2010 04:10:21 -0500 X-Greylist: delayed 626 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 04:10:21 EST Received: by aristoteles.cuci.nl (Postfix, from userid 500) id D0CD45439; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 09:59:52 +0100 (CET) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7vk4v4zlhg.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Junio C Hamano wrote: >Looks trivially correct; thanks. I'm just curious, but is this based on an actual bug which someone experienced, or is this just based on mere theoretical code analysis? -- Sincerely, Stephen R. van den Berg. "Am I paying for this abuse or is it extra?"