From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ilari Liusvaara Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] add --summary option to git-push and git-fetch Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 10:57:50 +0200 Message-ID: <20100130085750.GA27906@Knoppix> References: <20100130020548.GA29343@cthulhu> <7vsk9oysds.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <20100130075129.GA27702@Knoppix> <7vd40sxbli.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Larry D'Anna , git@vger.kernel.org, Daniel Barkalow , "Shawn O. Pearce" To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Jan 30 09:58:12 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nb99a-0000iF-Ma for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 09:58:07 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752736Ab0A3I57 (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Jan 2010 03:57:59 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752711Ab0A3I57 (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Jan 2010 03:57:59 -0500 Received: from emh06.mail.saunalahti.fi ([62.142.5.116]:44661 "EHLO emh06.mail.saunalahti.fi" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752620Ab0A3I57 (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Jan 2010 03:57:59 -0500 Received: from saunalahti-vams (vs3-12.mail.saunalahti.fi [62.142.5.96]) by emh06-2.mail.saunalahti.fi (Postfix) with SMTP id 3B26DC81EE; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 10:57:58 +0200 (EET) Received: from emh01.mail.saunalahti.fi ([62.142.5.107]) by vs3-12.mail.saunalahti.fi ([62.142.5.96]) with SMTP (gateway) id A0716437C9D; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 10:57:58 +0200 Received: from LK-Perkele-V (a88-113-39-59.elisa-laajakaista.fi [88.113.39.59]) by emh01.mail.saunalahti.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 675B74075; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 10:57:51 +0200 (EET) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7vd40sxbli.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Antivirus: VAMS Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 12:04:25AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Ilari Liusvaara writes: > > > Also, what about multiple-URL case? Don't know if there are problems, but it > > seems to be quite rarely tested... > > Pushing to more than one deliberately chooses to fork for each remote IIRC > to avoid any funnies. I don't see any forking in the code. It redoes transport_get() (transports can't really be reused...) and in the end does transport_disconnect(). And besides, what it did with internal protocol following remote helper didn't look very much like what would happen if it forked... -Ilari