From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Larry D'Anna Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] add --summary option to git-push and git-fetch Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 12:16:19 -0500 Message-ID: <20100204171619.GA9367@cthulhu> References: <20100130020548.GA29343@cthulhu> <7vsk9oysds.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <20100201005751.GA8322@cthulhu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Junio C Hamano To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Feb 04 18:16:59 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nd5Jt-00022N-NN for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2010 18:16:46 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754128Ab0BDRQV (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Feb 2010 12:16:21 -0500 Received: from cthulhu.elder-gods.org ([140.239.99.253]:44247 "EHLO cthulhu.elder-gods.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753989Ab0BDRQU (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Feb 2010 12:16:20 -0500 Received: by cthulhu.elder-gods.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5C5E182200D; Thu, 4 Feb 2010 12:16:19 -0500 (EST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100201005751.GA8322@cthulhu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: * Larry D'Anna (larry@elder-gods.org) [100131 19:57]: > So i guess you're saying that it would be better for update_local_ref and > print_summary_for_push_or_fetch to clear the flags, and just pass a rev_info for > print_summary_for_push_or_fetch instead of quickref? So, should I submit a version of the patch that does it this way? Should it use a subprocess? Should the option be called something other than --summary? Should I just forget about it? --larry