From: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
To: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net>
Cc: Giuseppe Bilotta <giuseppe.bilotta@gmail.com>,
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org,
Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: notes TODOs (was: Re: [PATCH 1/4] gitweb: notes feature)
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 16:27:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201002051627.05182.jnareb@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201002051546.19406.johan@herland.net>
On Fri, 5 Feb 2010, Johan Herland wrote:
> On Friday 05 February 2010, Giuseppe Bilotta wrote:
> > If I may be allowed to add a suggestion to put in the list, I would
> > like to see notes attachable to named refs (branch heads in
> > particular). From a cursory reading of your patches currently in pu
> > it would seem that you explicitly prohibit this case currently.
> > However, this has many possible uses, ranging from longer branch
> > descriptions to tracking information to improve survival in case of
> > remote rebases.
>
> Nope. There is no explicit prohibition on anything. On a fundamental
> level, Git-notes simply maps a given SHA1 (the annotated object) to
> another SHA1 (the object holding the annotation itself). In principle
> you can annotate _any_ SHA1, it doesn't even have to exist as a git
> object!
I guess that it isn't currently possible to map _path_ (here: fully
qualified name of ref, i.e. "refs/heads/master" in example) to SHA1
rather than SHA1 to SHA1, as fan-outs assumes mapping of SHA1 (to
object).
>
> In fact, something like the following abomination should solve
> your "problem" quite easily:
>
> git notes add $(echo "refs/heads/master" | git hash-object --stdin)
>
> (...washing my hands...)
This actually annotates (existing or not) _blob_ object with
"refs/heads/master" as contents (git-hash-object defaults to -t blob).
>
> > And one last comment: how do notes behave wrt to cloning and remote
> > handling? Am I correct in my understanding that notes are
> > (presently) local only? Would it make sense to have them cloned to
> > something like the refs/notes/remotes/* namespace?
>
> They are no more local than any other ref, except that they are
> outside the refspecs that are "usually" pushed/fetched (refs/heads/
> and refs/tags/).
>
> git push <remote> refs/notes/<foo>
> git fetch <remote> refs/notes/<foo>[:refs/notes/<foo>]
> etc.
>
> should all work as expected.
It would be nice, but I guess not possible, to have notes autofollowed
on fetch, like tags are autofollowed...
--
Jakub Narebski
Poland
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-05 15:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-05 12:44 notes TODOs (was: Re: [PATCH 1/4] gitweb: notes feature) Giuseppe Bilotta
2010-02-05 14:46 ` Johan Herland
2010-02-05 15:27 ` Jakub Narebski [this message]
2010-02-05 16:58 ` Giuseppe Bilotta
2010-02-06 11:30 ` Jakub Narebski
2010-02-06 18:01 ` notes TODOs Junio C Hamano
2010-02-07 19:05 ` Jakub Narebski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201002051627.05182.jnareb@gmail.com \
--to=jnareb@gmail.com \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=giuseppe.bilotta@gmail.com \
--cc=johan@herland.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).