From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Hommey Subject: Re: GSoC 2010 Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 10:16:35 +0100 Message-ID: <20100212091635.GA22942@glandium.org> References: <20100212080620.GA31719@dcvr.yhbt.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Johannes Schindelin , Eric Wong , Daniel Barkalow , Jeff King , "Shawn O. Pearce" , Git List To: Sverre Rabbelier X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Feb 12 10:16:55 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nfrdv-0001YK-Bh for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2010 10:16:55 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751082Ab0BLJQt (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Feb 2010 04:16:49 -0500 Received: from vuizook.err.no ([85.19.221.46]:36923 "EHLO vuizook.err.no" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750997Ab0BLJQs (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Feb 2010 04:16:48 -0500 Received: from cha92-13-88-165-248-19.fbx.proxad.net ([88.165.248.19] helo=jigen) by vuizook.err.no with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nfrdc-00056N-J6; Fri, 12 Feb 2010 10:16:39 +0100 Received: from mh by jigen with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Nfrdb-0005yV-Hr; Fri, 12 Feb 2010 10:16:35 +0100 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-GPG-Fingerprint: A479 A824 265C B2A5 FC54 8D1E DE4B DA2C 54FD 2A58 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Spam-Status: (score 0.1): No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=RDNS_DYNAMIC autolearn=disabled version=3.2.4 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 10:03:43AM +0100, Sverre Rabbelier wrote: > Heya, > > On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 10:02, Johannes Schindelin > wrote: > > Would it not make sense to implement git-remote-svn as a C program? That > > should help matters especially on Windows, where git-svn is very slow due > > to its using MSys (which is a stripped-down Cygwin, as you know, jumping > > through hoops to bring some POSIX-iness to Windows). > > It would very much be sense to do so, perhaps we should update the > wiki to say that implementing it in C is strongly preferred? It is already mentioned on the wiki that this would probably be a problem, license-wise. (the svn library is Apache license, which is incompatible with GPLv2) Mike