From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johan Herland Subject: Re: Commit annotations (editable commit messages) Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2010 22:46:04 +0100 Message-ID: <201002132246.04558.johan@herland.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Cc: Mark Lodato , Vladimir Panteleev To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Feb 13 22:46:17 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NgPof-00038C-D2 for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Sat, 13 Feb 2010 22:46:17 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758124Ab0BMVqL (ORCPT ); Sat, 13 Feb 2010 16:46:11 -0500 Received: from smtp.getmail.no ([84.208.15.66]:36783 "EHLO smtp.getmail.no" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750989Ab0BMVqK (ORCPT ); Sat, 13 Feb 2010 16:46:10 -0500 Received: from smtp.getmail.no ([10.5.16.4]) by get-mta-out01.get.basefarm.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7.0-0.04 64bit (built Jun 20 2008)) with ESMTP id <0KXS00FV9V4U5490@get-mta-out01.get.basefarm.net> for git@vger.kernel.org; Sat, 13 Feb 2010 22:46:06 +0100 (MET) Received: from alpha.localnet ([84.215.68.234]) by get-mta-in01.get.basefarm.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7.0-0.04 64bit (built Jun 20 2008)) with ESMTP id <0KXS00A4OV4TBL10@get-mta-in01.get.basefarm.net> for git@vger.kernel.org; Sat, 13 Feb 2010 22:46:06 +0100 (MET) X-PMX-Version: 5.5.3.366731, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.0.366912, Antispam-Data: 2010.2.13.213630 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.0 (Linux/2.6.32-ARCH; KDE/4.4.0; x86_64; ; ) In-reply-to: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Saturday 13 February 2010, Mark Lodato wrote: > 2010/2/12 Vladimir Panteleev : > > The documentation looks pretty scant. Does anyone know how close were > > my suggestions to the actual implemented behavior (esp. regarding > > rebasing)? > > 1, 2, 3, and 4 are all implemented, as far as I know. However, I > don't think notes copy during a rebase. The last patch of the latest iteration of the jh/notes series (posted 5 minutes ago) adds a "git notes copy" command that does just this. Patching rebase/cherry-pick/amend to call "git notes copy" should be fairly straightforward. ...Johan -- Johan Herland, www.herland.net