From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/6] am: Fix launching of pager Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 00:12:48 -0500 Message-ID: <20100215051248.GG3336@coredump.intra.peff.net> References: <462027ff1002131314k62069160h63760fc8316aa43b@mail.gmail.com> <20100213235156.GA9054@coredump.intra.peff.net> <20100214115430.GA1849@progeny.tock> <20100214120731.GE3499@progeny.tock> <20100215025958.GB17444@progeny.tock> <20100215032533.GA19230@progeny.tock> <20100215044223.GA3336@coredump.intra.peff.net> <20100215050413.GA19586@progeny.tock> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Sebastian Celis , Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org To: Jonathan Nieder X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Feb 15 06:12:51 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NgtGL-00040b-CV for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Mon, 15 Feb 2010 06:12:49 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752017Ab0BOFMp (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Feb 2010 00:12:45 -0500 Received: from peff.net ([208.65.91.99]:49195 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751770Ab0BOFMo (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Feb 2010 00:12:44 -0500 Received: (qmail 13376 invoked by uid 107); 15 Feb 2010 05:12:55 -0000 Received: from coredump.intra.peff.net (HELO coredump.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.2) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.40) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) SMTP; Mon, 15 Feb 2010 00:12:55 -0500 Received: by coredump.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 15 Feb 2010 00:12:48 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100215050413.GA19586@progeny.tock> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 11:04:13PM -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Jeff King wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 09:25:33PM -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > > >> + if tty <&1 >/dev/null 2>/dev/null > > > > We seem to use "test -t 1" for this elsewhere, and I don't see us using > > "tty" anywhere else. It is POSIX, and I tested that even Solaris 8 and > > AIX 6.1 have it. So I don't think it is a portability issue, but others > > may know more than I. > > tty is portable, but "test -t 1" is cleaner. Thanks for the pointer. There is another one in the test script in patch 6/6, btw. -Peff