From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: git as an sfc member project Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 07:37:00 -0500 Message-ID: <20100226123700.GC10198@coredump.intra.peff.net> References: <20100224154452.GA25872@coredump.intra.peff.net> <7vmxyytsdt.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <20100226122957.GB10198@coredump.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Feb 26 13:37:20 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NkzRS-0002TS-79 for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2010 13:37:14 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S935853Ab0BZMhF (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Feb 2010 07:37:05 -0500 Received: from peff.net ([208.65.91.99]:51073 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S935302Ab0BZMhE (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Feb 2010 07:37:04 -0500 Received: (qmail 31982 invoked by uid 107); 26 Feb 2010 12:37:19 -0000 Received: from coredump.intra.peff.net (HELO coredump.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.2) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.40) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) SMTP; Fri, 26 Feb 2010 07:37:19 -0500 Received: by coredump.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 26 Feb 2010 07:37:00 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100226122957.GB10198@coredump.intra.peff.net> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 07:29:57AM -0500, Jeff King wrote: > > Part of my git time used to be funded jointly by my employer and NEC, but > > the latter is not anymore. I need to look for sponsors. > > Thanks, I'll make a note. I split it into: > > [Existing affiliations...] > Part of Junio Hamano's time on git is funded by his employer. > > [Past Affiliations...] > Part of Junio Hamano's time on git used to be funded by NEC, but that > is no longer the case. > > Do you want to mention your employer by name? Actually, scratch that. Those sections are about _project_ affiliation, and this is really about individual developer affiliation. I'll put it under the "affiliations of key developers section". -Peff