git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
To: Alexander Gladysh <agladysh@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Cherry-pick with symlinks fails horribly
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 04:48:22 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201003120448.22821.chriscool@tuxfamily.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c6c947f61003110416l40a85b6fg7ede2403a8f6961b@mail.gmail.com>

On Thursday 11 March 2010 13:16:09 Alexander Gladysh wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 07:57, Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org> 
wrote:
> > On Tuesday 09 March 2010 02:28:30 Alexander Gladysh wrote:
> >> I'm complaining about Git symlink handling again. This time it is
> >>  cherry-pick.
> >
> > I can reproduce the bug here on Linux. And Git v1.6.0 has the same bug.
> > So I suspect an old bug in unpack_trees.c. I will try to have another
> > look at it this evening, but I am not familiar with that code.
> 
> I have found my old bug-report. There is even some patch in that thread.
> 
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/120741/
> 
> Not sure if it is the same issue or if the patch was even merged in
>  though...

The patch was merged:

commit 77716755cbdf970fa0814a5f77c884b1f17693de
Author: Kjetil Barvik <barvik@broadpark.no>
Date:   Sun Jun 14 15:08:28 2009 +0200

    lstat_cache: guard against full match of length of 'name' parameter

so I think it is a different issue, but feel free to test.

Anyway when looking at t/t6035-merge-dir-to-symlink.sh, we can see that there 
are still 2 broken tests:

$ ./t6035-merge-dir-to-symlink.sh
*   ok 1: create a commit where dir a/b changed to symlink
*   ok 2: keep a/b-2/c/d across checkout
*   ok 3: checkout should not have deleted a/b-2/c/d
*   ok 4: setup for merge test
*   ok 5: do not lose a/b-2/c/d in merge (resolve)
*   still broken 6: do not lose a/b-2/c/d in merge (recursive)
*   ok 7: setup a merge where dir a/b-2 changed to symlink
*   ok 8: merge should not have conflicts (resolve)
*   still broken 9: merge should not have conflicts (recursive)
* still have 2 known breakage(s)
* passed all remaining 7 test(s)

So it looks like breakages in this area are known, though perhaps not your 
particular breakage.

Best regards,
Christian.

  reply	other threads:[~2010-03-12  3:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-03-09  1:28 Cherry-pick with symlinks fails horribly Alexander Gladysh
2010-03-10 18:54 ` Alexander Gladysh
2010-03-11  4:57 ` Christian Couder
2010-03-11 12:16   ` Alexander Gladysh
2010-03-12  3:48     ` Christian Couder [this message]
2010-03-12  5:49       ` Junio C Hamano
2010-03-25  5:01         ` Christian Couder

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201003120448.22821.chriscool@tuxfamily.org \
    --to=chriscool@tuxfamily.org \
    --cc=agladysh@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).