From: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
To: Chris Packham <judge.packham@gmail.com>
Cc: GIT <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: re-running merge on a single file
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 10:00:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201003121000.25217.jnareb@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a038bef51003111633v5d5d418bu332b63bb3874e3ef@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010, Chris Packham wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 3:20 PM, Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Try
> >
> > $ git show :1:$(git rev-parse --show-prefix)cpu/mpc83xx/start.S \
> > > cpu/mpc83xx/start.S.base
>
> git show doesn't complain about the path. But I'm obviously not
> setting the stage correctly
>
> $ git checkout --merge -- cpu/mpc83xx/start.S
> $ git show :1:$(git rev-parse --show-prefix)cpu/mpc83xx/start.S
> fatal: Path 'cpu/mpc83xx/start.S' is in the index, but not at stage 1.
> Did you mean ':0:cpu/mpc83xx/start.S'?
>
> By now I have additional commits that touch cpu/mpc83xx/start.S so
> I'll see if I can find a file that I haven't touched since the merge.
Note that "git checkout --merge <file>" re-creates <file> in the state
of textual merge conflict from the index (from stages 1, 2, 3). It is
not able, unfortunately, to recover stages in index if you marked
<file> as resolved using "git add <file>".
Note also that you would get non-0 stages in index only if there was
a *merge conflict* for a file which was not automatically resolved.
If cpu/mpc83xx/start.S resolved cleanly, it would be in stage-0 only.
You can check what stages you have in index for a specified file using
$ git ls-files --stage cpu/mpc83xx/start.S
If you don't have stages 1 and 2 in the index (which you can check using
command provided above), you can instead get versions of a file which
would be used in resolving conflict:
$ git show HEAD:cpu/mpc83xx/start.S \
>cpu/mpc83xx/start.S.ours
$ git show MERGE_HEAD:cpu/mpc83xx/start.S \
>cpu/mpc83xx/start.S.theirs
$ git show $(git merge-base HEAD MERGE_HEAD):cpu/mpc83xx/start.S \
>cpu/mpc83xx/start.S.base
Sidenote: versions in stage 1, 2, 3 differ from above versions in that
they have those conflict (chunks) that can be automatically resolved,
resolved.
HTH
--
Jakub Narebski
Poland
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-12 9:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-11 18:54 re-running merge on a single file Chris Packham
2010-03-11 19:09 ` Chris Packham
2010-03-11 20:29 ` Markus Heidelberg
2010-03-11 22:08 ` Chris Packham
2010-03-11 23:20 ` Jakub Narebski
[not found] ` <a038bef51003111631n38f7e50cp79d8335109f3ed0@mail.gmail.com>
2010-03-12 0:33 ` Chris Packham
2010-03-12 6:45 ` Johannes Sixt
2010-03-12 6:56 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-03-12 20:16 ` Chris Packham
2010-03-12 21:16 ` Chris Packham
2010-03-12 23:07 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-03-12 23:43 ` Chris Packham
2010-03-14 12:24 ` Kris Shannon
2010-03-12 9:00 ` Jakub Narebski [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201003121000.25217.jnareb@gmail.com \
--to=jnareb@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=judge.packham@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).