git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini@gnu.org>,
	Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>,
	git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: cc/cherry-pick-ff (Re: What's cooking in git.git (Mar 2010, #04; Tue, 16))
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 04:52:18 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100317095218.GA6961@progeny.tock> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7vhbof4fof.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>

Junio C Hamano wrote:

> * cc/cherry-pick-ff (2010-03-06) 7 commits
>   (merged to 'next' on 2010-03-07 at 5589b26)
>  + rebase -i: use new --ff cherry-pick option
>  + cherry-pick: add a no-op --no-ff option to future proof scripts
>  + Documentation: describe new cherry-pick --ff option
>  + cherry-pick: add tests for new --ff option
>  + revert: add --ff option to allow fast forward when cherry-picking
>  + builtin/merge: make checkout_fast_forward() non static
>  + parse-options: add parse_options_concat() to concat options
> 
> I think this is ready for 'master'; comments?

For what it’s worth, I am not convinced about the --no-ff option.  I do
not think --ff ever will be the default: for an operation that amounts
to applying a patch and making a new commit, it just feels wrong.

On the other hand, I have no objection to --no-ff as an undocumented
feature, to allow scripts using the flag to be backwards compatible.  If
--ff will become the default some day, we could start advertising the
--no-ff option as soon as we know that.  Why worry script authors and
use up space in the manual before then?

Just my two cents,
Jonathan

  reply	other threads:[~2010-03-17  9:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-03-17  6:37 What's cooking in git.git (Mar 2010, #04; Tue, 16) Junio C Hamano
2010-03-17  9:52 ` Jonathan Nieder [this message]
2010-03-17 17:01   ` cc/cherry-pick-ff (Re: What's cooking in git.git (Mar 2010, #04; Tue, 16)) Junio C Hamano
2010-03-18  0:38     ` Christian Couder
2010-03-18  7:14       ` Paolo Bonzini
2010-03-20 14:20       ` Junio C Hamano
2010-03-20 22:09         ` cc/cherry-pick-ff Jonathan Nieder
2010-03-22  3:03         ` cc/cherry-pick-ff (Re: What's cooking in git.git (Mar 2010, #04; Tue, 16)) Christian Couder

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100317095218.GA6961@progeny.tock \
    --to=jrnieder@gmail.com \
    --cc=bonzini@gnu.org \
    --cc=chriscool@tuxfamily.org \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).