From: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini@gnu.org>,
Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>,
git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: cc/cherry-pick-ff (Re: What's cooking in git.git (Mar 2010, #04; Tue, 16))
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 04:52:18 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100317095218.GA6961@progeny.tock> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7vhbof4fof.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
Junio C Hamano wrote:
> * cc/cherry-pick-ff (2010-03-06) 7 commits
> (merged to 'next' on 2010-03-07 at 5589b26)
> + rebase -i: use new --ff cherry-pick option
> + cherry-pick: add a no-op --no-ff option to future proof scripts
> + Documentation: describe new cherry-pick --ff option
> + cherry-pick: add tests for new --ff option
> + revert: add --ff option to allow fast forward when cherry-picking
> + builtin/merge: make checkout_fast_forward() non static
> + parse-options: add parse_options_concat() to concat options
>
> I think this is ready for 'master'; comments?
For what it’s worth, I am not convinced about the --no-ff option. I do
not think --ff ever will be the default: for an operation that amounts
to applying a patch and making a new commit, it just feels wrong.
On the other hand, I have no objection to --no-ff as an undocumented
feature, to allow scripts using the flag to be backwards compatible. If
--ff will become the default some day, we could start advertising the
--no-ff option as soon as we know that. Why worry script authors and
use up space in the manual before then?
Just my two cents,
Jonathan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-17 9:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-17 6:37 What's cooking in git.git (Mar 2010, #04; Tue, 16) Junio C Hamano
2010-03-17 9:52 ` Jonathan Nieder [this message]
2010-03-17 17:01 ` cc/cherry-pick-ff (Re: What's cooking in git.git (Mar 2010, #04; Tue, 16)) Junio C Hamano
2010-03-18 0:38 ` Christian Couder
2010-03-18 7:14 ` Paolo Bonzini
2010-03-20 14:20 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-03-20 22:09 ` cc/cherry-pick-ff Jonathan Nieder
2010-03-22 3:03 ` cc/cherry-pick-ff (Re: What's cooking in git.git (Mar 2010, #04; Tue, 16)) Christian Couder
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100317095218.GA6961@progeny.tock \
--to=jrnieder@gmail.com \
--cc=bonzini@gnu.org \
--cc=chriscool@tuxfamily.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).