From: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Carlos Rica" <jasampler@gmail.com>,
"Santi Béjar" <santi@agolina.net>, "Johannes Sixt" <j6t@kdbg.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4/5 v2] tag -v: Do not spawn a separate process for verify-tag
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2010 17:14:51 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100320221451.GB31098@progeny.tock> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100320051414.GD24791@progeny.tock>
Aside from handling of SIGPIPE, there was no reason for verify-tag
to run in a separate process.
Not much advantage to this I can see. It just simplifies things
a little.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
---
Rebased to remove the churn from patch 1, as suggested by Johannes.
Thanks.
The new series has only 4 patches:
[PATCH 2/5] verify-tag: use sigchain library to block SIGPIPE
[PATCH 3/5] Expose verify_tag()
[PATCH 4/5 v2] tag -v: Do not spawn a separate process for verify-tag
[PATCH 5/5] verify_tag_signature(): let caller look up tag object sha1
builtin/tag.c | 6 +-----
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/builtin/tag.c b/builtin/tag.c
index 4ef1c4f..d138e0c 100644
--- a/builtin/tag.c
+++ b/builtin/tag.c
@@ -147,11 +147,7 @@ static int delete_tag(const char *name, const char *ref,
static int verify_tag(const char *name, const char *ref,
const unsigned char *sha1)
{
- const char *argv_verify_tag[] = {"git-verify-tag",
- "-v", "SHA1_HEX", NULL};
- argv_verify_tag[2] = sha1_to_hex(sha1);
-
- if (run_command_v_opt(argv_verify_tag, 0))
+ if (verify_tag_signature(sha1_to_hex(sha1), 1))
return error("could not verify the tag '%s'", name);
return 0;
}
--
1.7.0.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-20 22:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-20 5:09 [PATCH/RFC 0/5] libify verify_tag() Jonathan Nieder
2010-03-20 5:11 ` [PATCH 1/5] tag -v: use ‘git verify-tag’ without dash Jonathan Nieder
2010-03-20 16:01 ` Johannes Sixt
2010-03-20 21:29 ` Jonathan Nieder
2010-03-20 5:12 ` [PATCH 2/5] verify-tag: use sigchain library to block SIGPIPE Jonathan Nieder
2010-03-20 5:13 ` [PATCH 3/5] Expose verify_tag() Jonathan Nieder
2010-03-20 5:14 ` [PATCH 4/5] tag -v: Do not spawn a separate process for verify-tag Jonathan Nieder
2010-03-20 22:14 ` Jonathan Nieder [this message]
2010-03-20 5:14 ` [PATCH 5/5] verify_tag_signature(): let caller look up tag object sha1 Jonathan Nieder
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100320221451.GB31098@progeny.tock \
--to=jrnieder@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=j6t@kdbg.org \
--cc=jasampler@gmail.com \
--cc=santi@agolina.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).