From: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
To: Marc Branchaud <marcnarc@xiplink.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@viscovery.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Test that the 'rebase -i' "reword" command always cherry-picks a commit.
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 17:09:29 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100322220929.GA1384@progeny.tock> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1269285942-17496-1-git-send-email-marcnarc@xiplink.com>
Marc Branchaud wrote:
> Is this more acceptable than adding --no-ff to rebase--interactive?
No, in my opinion the latter is better, and I suspect it will go in. :)
No one has objected to the --no-ff option. I like it: if someone is
trying to reset the committer date on a collection of patches, I’d
rather they use rebase -f or rebase -i --no-ff than format-patch and am.
It’s cooking in pu for the moment, and from here the natural progression
is to next, master, then maybe maint.
Hope that helps,
Jonathan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-22 22:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-16 16:08 [PATCH] Teach --no-ff option to 'rebase -i' Marc Branchaud
2010-03-16 19:19 ` Marc Branchaud
2010-03-16 19:42 ` [PATCHv2] " Marc Branchaud
2010-03-16 21:47 ` Jonathan Nieder
2010-03-17 6:59 ` Johannes Sixt
2010-03-17 15:58 ` Peter Baumann
2010-03-17 16:07 ` Johannes Sixt
2010-03-17 18:42 ` Peter Baumann
2010-03-18 7:08 ` Johannes Sixt
2010-03-18 8:03 ` Peter Baumann
2010-03-17 16:03 ` Marc Branchaud
2010-03-17 16:19 ` Johannes Sixt
2010-03-17 18:10 ` Marc Branchaud
2010-03-22 19:25 ` [PATCH] Test that the 'rebase -i' "reword" command always cherry-picks a commit Marc Branchaud
2010-03-22 20:23 ` Avery Pennarun
2010-03-22 22:06 ` Marc Branchaud
2010-03-22 20:46 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-03-23 14:38 ` Marc Branchaud
2010-03-23 16:19 ` [PATCHv3] Teach -f/--force-rebase option to 'rebase -i' Marc Branchaud
2010-03-23 22:42 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-03-24 15:40 ` [PATCHv4 0/2] Teach the --no-ff " Marc Branchaud
2010-03-24 17:13 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-03-24 20:34 ` [PATCHv5] Teach rebase the --no-ff option Marc Branchaud
2010-03-24 21:45 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-03-24 15:41 ` [PATCH 1/2] Teach 'rebase -i' to accept and ignore the -f/--force-rebase option Marc Branchaud
2010-03-24 15:41 ` [PATCH 2/2] Teach the --no-ff option to 'rebase -i' Marc Branchaud
2010-03-24 19:06 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-03-23 19:16 ` [PATCH] Test that the 'rebase -i' "reword" command always cherry-picks a commit Jonathan Nieder
2010-03-22 22:09 ` Jonathan Nieder [this message]
2010-03-17 15:56 ` [PATCHv2] Teach --no-ff option to 'rebase -i' Marc Branchaud
2010-03-17 17:53 ` Jonathan Nieder
2010-03-17 18:13 ` Jonathan Nieder
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100322220929.GA1384@progeny.tock \
--to=jrnieder@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=j.sixt@viscovery.net \
--cc=marcnarc@xiplink.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).