From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] Add support for GIT_ONE_FILESYSTEM Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 19:02:11 -0400 Message-ID: <20100330230211.GC608@coredump.intra.peff.net> References: <1268855753-25840-1-git-send-email-lars@pixar.com> <1268855753-25840-4-git-send-email-lars@pixar.com> <20100328092253.GA17563@coredump.intra.peff.net> <7vr5n44crq.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Junio C Hamano , "Lars R. Damerow" , git@vger.kernel.org To: Linus Torvalds X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Mar 31 01:02:30 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NwkS4-0004Sq-Sm for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 01:02:29 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754579Ab0C3XCY (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Mar 2010 19:02:24 -0400 Received: from peff.net ([208.65.91.99]:48761 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753276Ab0C3XCX (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Mar 2010 19:02:23 -0400 Received: (qmail 26978 invoked by uid 107); 30 Mar 2010 23:02:57 -0000 Received: from coredump.intra.peff.net (HELO coredump.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.2) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.40) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) SMTP; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 19:02:57 -0400 Received: by coredump.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 30 Mar 2010 19:02:11 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 03:43:01PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > I realize that I'm late to the party, but I do wonder if the "one > filesystem" mode shouldn't be the default, rather than be enabled by a > config option? IOW, just switch the meaning of the config option the other > way. Fashionably late, of course. I agree with your reasoning that it is a more sane default. The only thing that would make me hesitate on it now is that it is a behavior change. I suspect the group we would be breaking is small or even zero, though. -Peff