From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Sixt Subject: Re: [PATCH] git-gui: Fast staging/unstaging of hunks/lines Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 19:45:16 +0200 Message-ID: <201004121945.16216.j6t@kdbg.org> References: <7ed246d74b2ea872a4af3b99d519590ab17ffefc.1270457921.git.bert.wesarg@googlemail.com> <201004112101.54908.j6t@kdbg.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Shawn O. Pearce" , git@vger.kernel.org To: Bert Wesarg X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Apr 12 19:47:41 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O1NjW-0002Gj-EH for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 19:47:38 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752492Ab0DLRrc (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Apr 2010 13:47:32 -0400 Received: from bsmtp4.bon.at ([195.3.86.186]:60648 "EHLO bsmtp.bon.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751515Ab0DLRrc (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Apr 2010 13:47:32 -0400 Received: from dx.sixt.local (unknown [93.83.142.38]) by bsmtp.bon.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA9582C400C; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 19:47:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dx.sixt.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 507C019F581; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 19:45:16 +0200 (CEST) User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Montag, 12. April 2010, Bert Wesarg wrote: > I don't feel comfortable with this ambiguity myself. I see two ways to > solve this: > > a) Use Shift-Button-1 for lines > > or > > b) Use Shift-Control-Button-1 for lines > > and make Control-Button-1 only stage hunks. That's worse, because you need Shift-Button-1 to extend a selection. The problem is that the X-Windowsy way to overload single-click operations. Personally, I prefer to get an operative response only on double-click. It's still unused, I think. -- Hannes