From: Chris Webb <chris@arachsys.com>
To: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
kusmabite@gmail.com, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] Replace hard-coded path with one from <paths.h>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 13:40:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100415124043.GH12365@arachsys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3hbncgaxu.fsf@localhost.localdomain>
Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> writes:
> All other such variables are described at the top of main Makefile,
> for example:
>
> #
> # Define NO_LIBGEN_H if you don't have libgen.h.
>
> I think that HAVE_PATHS_H should also have such one-line description.
> By the way it the very first variable with HAVE_* rather than NEEDS_*
> or NO_* name.
To be honest, I used the name suggested to me earlier in the thread without
a great deal of checking to see how consistent it was with existing naming
convention.
Blacklisting OSes with a NO_PATHS_H #define feels like a mistake, as unknown
OSes will fail rather than assuming a safe (if slightly untidy) default. I
got caught out assuming that Windows was sane in this regard, for instance.
To me, NEEDS_PATH_H hints that a system with paths.h would break if it
weren't included, rather than that this is an extra feature available on
this OS. But if NEEDS_* is used elsewhere to enable optional extras on
systems which support them, I agree we should change to NEEDS_PATH_H to be
consistent.
> Why not
>
> +#ifdef HAVE_PATHS_H
> +#include <paths.h>
> +#endif
> +#ifndef _PATH_DEFPATH
> +#define _PATH_DEFPATH "/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin"
> +#endif
>
> This way you are covered if some other header provides _PATH_DEFPATH.
Yes, makes sense, although I think _PATH_DEFPATH is very unlikely to be
provided outside of <paths.h>.
Best wishes,
Chris.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-15 12:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-04 20:48 [PATCH] Replace hard-coded path with one configurable at make time Chris Webb
2010-04-04 21:38 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-04-04 22:28 ` Chris Webb
2010-04-06 16:35 ` Chris Webb
2010-04-06 16:36 ` [PATCH] Replace hard-coded path with one from <paths.h> Chris Webb
2010-04-07 10:57 ` Erik Faye-Lund
2010-04-08 10:58 ` Chris Webb
2010-04-08 11:26 ` Erik Faye-Lund
2010-04-08 11:57 ` [PATCH v2] " Chris Webb
2010-04-08 12:08 ` Erik Faye-Lund
2010-04-09 5:45 ` Chris Webb
2010-04-13 9:06 ` Chris Webb
2010-04-13 9:07 ` [PATCH v3] " Chris Webb
2010-04-13 20:01 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-04-14 7:22 ` Chris Webb
2010-04-15 12:27 ` Jakub Narebski
2010-04-15 19:15 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-04-15 12:25 ` Jakub Narebski
2010-04-15 12:40 ` Chris Webb [this message]
2010-04-15 12:57 ` Jakub Narebski
2010-04-15 13:01 ` Chris Webb
2010-04-15 13:21 ` [PATCH v4] " Chris Webb
2010-04-09 23:54 ` [PATCH] " Tait
2010-04-06 16:57 ` [PATCH] git-instaweb: pass through invoking user's path to gitweb CGI script Chris Webb
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100415124043.GH12365@arachsys.com \
--to=chris@arachsys.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=jnareb@gmail.com \
--cc=kusmabite@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).