From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jonathan Nieder Subject: Re: bug in name-rev on linux-2.6 repo? Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 10:03:25 -0500 Message-ID: <20100422150325.GB4801@progeny.tock> References: <20100421195822.GX10984@baikonur.stro.at> <20100422121408.GI3211@stro.at> <20100422124042.GA1433@progeny.tock> <20100422144433.GB28923@coredump.intra.peff.net> <20100422145455.GC28923@coredump.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Andreas Schwab , maximilian attems , Tay Ray Chuan , git@vger.kernel.org To: Jeff King X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Apr 22 17:10:13 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O4y2e-00074o-3k for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 17:10:12 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754480Ab0DVPKB (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Apr 2010 11:10:01 -0400 Received: from mail-pv0-f174.google.com ([74.125.83.174]:63074 "EHLO mail-pv0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754169Ab0DVPKA (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Apr 2010 11:10:00 -0400 Received: by pvh1 with SMTP id 1so440184pvh.19 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 08:09:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:cc:subject :message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=bmYDWPjya6IyQrPNeq5yauY9LUSnYi4PaxEbO+IZLJM=; b=Ta0T/eO8A2pfX0Kj+U+opNa4+icVJ+ll3BSA0vt5qnsd1SSbpxhj97P5IozZWDTomI G76Gx30VJP2r0tU+ssaflM0Sap9XvkN4g6aFuGDSAZ1x0r52KLVI7AtIi6bSyBzeiLYG ew5K38/7duvPbq4Qcds1VLZ6p0Elim+BxrF8Y= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=hQNJrmi7LMnFMXXPpc/fjjMpxloUdCeJ8EAqBfV+nIoV595++UqEyyU+Q81AxijTg4 eGvLLdYyjDMFOx4JddvIEEmdK3zrGIGV+0MAXAZm8fuWs2GNXGorwUUXb7bKoOW3LKeX LiwJl2xgKUxh6YQqpiqWJrGvgS2Ee6LRpiadI= Received: by 10.142.250.1 with SMTP id x1mr138848wfh.109.1271948592812; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 08:03:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from progeny.tock (c-98-212-3-231.hsd1.il.comcast.net [98.212.3.231]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v41sm22400wfh.21.2010.04.22.08.03.10 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 22 Apr 2010 08:03:11 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100422145455.GC28923@coredump.intra.peff.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jeff King wrote: > Still looking, but definitely some kind of skew problem. That explains it, then: $ git log --format=%cd' %h' 19f5fb7 ^v2.6.34-rc1~200 Sun Jan 24 14:34:07 2010 -0500 19f5fb7 Mon Dec 7 10:36:20 2009 -0500 d2eecb0 Fri Jan 1 01:00:21 2010 -0500 f8ec9d6 Wed Dec 23 07:45:44 2009 -0500 71f2be2 Fri Jan 22 17:40:42 2010 -0500 1f2acb6 Mon Feb 15 20:17:55 2010 -0500 15121c1 Thu Feb 4 23:58:38 2010 -0500 a1de02d This part of the history is linear. Is the rule that every commit must be at most one day before each of its parents? This should probably be documented somewhere, since it is possible to override the committer date with GIT_COMMITTER_DATE. Jonathan