From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Hartmetz Subject: Re: git branch documentation improvements Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 20:27:04 +0200 Message-ID: <201005112027.05818.ahartmetz@gmail.com> References: <201005070024.41172.ahartmetz@gmail.com> <201005081839.37790.ahartmetz@gmail.com> <4BE7A629.7050709@viscovery.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Jon Seymour To: Johannes Sixt X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue May 11 20:27:54 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OBuBN-0000DA-KZ for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Tue, 11 May 2010 20:27:54 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932456Ab0EKS1P (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 May 2010 14:27:15 -0400 Received: from mail-fx0-f46.google.com ([209.85.161.46]:34482 "EHLO mail-fx0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932541Ab0EKS1M (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 May 2010 14:27:12 -0400 Received: by fxm19 with SMTP id 19so758291fxm.19 for ; Tue, 11 May 2010 11:27:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date :user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=d+eTwhWliDgM1XZH5tPU/+iD/0Ch9aZXyM6dxsH+7xE=; b=C3o9Z3P571EWX4vTwxROImGAiDikg8DF2cME2wHxBiJf7sg21WvqDua4Et5sOwRNe3 /AURe6c8WC1vgAe3rZKQyzaXnXcjGXUD8I4eL6qYrzqCB3UpzpyBivzBGH6J5uHrYmeE /lRXc1yBpSxheIkxjCaaGVnfTUPqKfkI27Asc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=xJuhmu3HtKJbvwZ5p8fGj/7WlTfQYwf1ilg0GqkijvvDgSVX6ybll6MQkr5rs+oXSY 9LgVIfn3TtFQySi5gb/AR4YVTBs/6XffCdk8xqgWKNzYU02uJ33s79YeXVgOshDNDXW7 RxHhb8PrIZjazqC640+dOqyia7wO1aAmSHiS4= Received: by 10.223.144.77 with SMTP id y13mr6652100fau.86.1273602431045; Tue, 11 May 2010 11:27:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rechenplan.localnet (brln-4dba81cc.pool.mediaWays.net [77.186.129.204]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u12sm27767672fah.4.2010.05.11.11.27.09 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 11 May 2010 11:27:09 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: KMail/1.13.3 (Linux/2.6.33-02063303-generic; KDE/4.4.75; x86_64; svn-1124099; 2010-05-04) In-Reply-To: <4BE7A629.7050709@viscovery.net> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Monday 10 May 2010 08:22:33 Johannes Sixt wrote: > Am 5/8/2010 18:39, schrieb Andreas Hartmetz: > > On Friday 07 May 2010 09:20:15 Johannes Sixt wrote: > >> But what is wrong with "start-point"? It precisely conveys the meaning > >> of the parameter. > > > > Look at -f: as far as I understand it moves the branch *head*, so > > start-point is plain wrong. The "root" of the branch is not moved, or > > only moved indirectly (not sure if the latter is allowed). > > Huh? The purpose of -f is not to *move* a branch head, but to say "trust > me, I know what I'm doing". Why would "start-point" not be suitable in > this case? > Because a branch doesn't start at the head.