From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christian Couder Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] revert: allow cherry-picking more than one commit Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2010 06:18:26 +0200 Message-ID: <201006030618.26838.chriscool@tuxfamily.org> References: <20100531193359.28729.55562.chriscool@tuxfamily.org> <20100601083549.GA28377@progeny.tock> <7vwruh9fbj.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Jonathan Nieder , git@vger.kernel.org, Johannes Schindelin , Sverre Rabbelier , Ramkumar Ramachandra To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Jun 03 06:18:43 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OK1tD-0003hu-3j for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Thu, 03 Jun 2010 06:18:43 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750840Ab0FCESi convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Jun 2010 00:18:38 -0400 Received: from smtp3-g21.free.fr ([212.27.42.3]:40264 "EHLO smtp3-g21.free.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750767Ab0FCESh convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Jun 2010 00:18:37 -0400 Received: from style.localnet (gre92-7-82-243-130-161.fbx.proxad.net [82.243.130.161]) by smtp3-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EB0281807C; Thu, 3 Jun 2010 06:18:29 +0200 (CEST) User-Agent: KMail/1.12.2 (Linux/2.6.31-20-generic; KDE/4.3.2; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <7vwruh9fbj.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Thursday 03 June 2010 01:37:20 Junio C Hamano wrote: > Jonathan Nieder writes: > > As a side effect, this unfortunately changes the meaning of > > =E2=80=98git log --oneline --decorate --no-walk -5 --all=E2=80=99: = instead of listing > > five refs, after this patch that command would list the five most > > recent commits. >=20 > It indeed is a change in behaviour, but in this case it is probably n= ot > such a big deal. > > The order "--all" (or "--branches" for that matter) lists refs doesn'= t > have any logical relationship with the order of importance from the e= nd > user's point of view (they're just alphabetical), and asking for "fir= st > five" won't make much sense unless you are learning or testing the > combinations of options, i.e. not in real life, I think. I agree and I think Jonathan's patch would be nice to have. Thanks both, Christian.