From: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
To: Pavan Kumar Sunkara <pavan.sss1991@gmail.com>
Cc: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>,
Petr Baudis <pasky@ucw.cz>,
git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: About [PATCH 2/2] gitweb: Create a perl module to handle gitweb cgi params and vars
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2010 12:17:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201006031217.07525.jnareb@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTilYSAj_byhZ1WDEBrYOAj6OZVsyDmp59vuK0tQz@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 3 Jun 2010, Pavan Kumar Sunkara wrote:
> Jakub Narebski wrote:
>> Shouldn't evaluate_query_params(), evaluate_path_info(), and the
>> subroutine that ties them together evaluate_and_validate_params() be
>> in Gitweb::Request too?
>>
>> Ditto with evaluate_git_dir()?
>
> Well, evaluate_and_validate_params() and evaluate_path_info() contains
> calls to subroutines which are not yet moved into any package. So,
> what do you want to in such a case ?
O.K., in this case you should mention in the commit message that
the subroutines evaluate_query_params(), evaluate_path_info(),
evaluate_and_validate_params() and evaluate_git_dir() didn't get
moved to Gitweb::Request because evaluate_and_validate_params()
and evaluate_path_info() contain calls to check_head_link(),
die_error() and validate_*() subroutines which are not yet moved
into any package. And it doesn't make sense to put only some
of them in Gitweb::Request.
We can always move them later.
P.S. The validate_*() subroutines could also be moved to
Gitweb::Request. The check_head_link() subroutine looks like
candidate for Gitweb::Util / Gitweb::Utils; I am not sure where
one should put die_error() and friends: git_header_html(),
git_footer_html(), get_page_title(), and other subroutines
they use.
--
Jakub Narebski
Poland
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-03 10:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-02 20:29 About [PATCH] gitweb: Create a perl module to store gitweb configuration Jakub Narebski
2010-06-03 5:07 ` Pavan Kumar Sunkara
2010-06-03 10:23 ` Jakub Narebski
2010-06-03 8:55 ` About [PATCH 2/2] gitweb: Create a perl module to handle gitweb cgi params and vars Jakub Narebski
2010-06-03 9:52 ` Pavan Kumar Sunkara
2010-06-03 10:17 ` Jakub Narebski [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201006031217.07525.jnareb@gmail.com \
--to=jnareb@gmail.com \
--cc=chriscool@tuxfamily.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pasky@ucw.cz \
--cc=pavan.sss1991@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).