From: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
To: Pavan Kumar Sunkara <pavan.sss1991@gmail.com>
Cc: Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz>,
git@vger.kernel.org, Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH GSoC 1/3] gitweb: Create Gitweb::Config module
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2010 20:43:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201006032043.14071.jnareb@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimoA95U0vivTzrc0XZ8i6q-SfCFA6RgMWK67OWl@mail.gmail.com>
Pavan Kumar Sunkara wrote:
> 2010/6/3 Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>:
>> On Tue, 3 Jun 2010, Petr Baudis wrote:
>>>> +
>>>> +use Gitweb::Config;
>>>>
>>>> BEGIN {
>>>> CGI->compile() if $ENV{'MOD_PERL'};
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> -our $version = "++GIT_VERSION++";
>>>> +$version = "++GIT_VERSION++";
>>
>> This change is not necessary.
>>
>> our $version = "++GIT_VERSION++";
>>
>> would keep working even if '$version' is declared in other module and
>> exported by this module (is imported into current scope).
>
> Ok. Will change it.
[...]
>> I would say
>>
>> our $GIT = "++GIT_BINDIR++/git";
>
> But, I think when we start reading the code, it would seem that 'our
> $GIT' implies that it is a variable created locally rather than an
> exported variable from Gitweb::Config module.
From `perldoc -f our`:
An "our" declares the listed variables to be valid globals within the
enclosing block, file, or "eval". That is, it has the same scoping
rules as a "my" declaration, but does not create a local variable.
[...] The package in which the variable is entered is determined at
the point of the declaration, [...]
So if the variable already exists in given scope, for example if the
variable was imported from other package, the 'our' declaration would
be a no-op.
>
> Even though it increases the patch size, I don't think it will be much
> of a concern when it comes to good redability of code.
>
> Jakub: Can you reply, what you think about this argument ?
But I agree that first, 'our $var' seems to imply that it is _new_
variable declared in current scope, and second if we make a typo in
variable name it wouldn't be detected as different from exported
variable: 'our' will create new variable.
So I agree that removing 'our' is a good idea, especially together
with putting all variables that should be there in Gitweb::Config
together with comments, even if they are configured during build
process.
Perhaps those declarations in Gitweb::Config should have in-line
comment that they are defined in gitweb.cgi / gitweb.perl?
--
Jakub Narebski
Poland
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-03 18:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-03 13:55 [PATCH GSoC 1/3] gitweb: Create Gitweb::Config module Pavan Kumar Sunkara
2010-06-03 13:55 ` [PATCH GSoC 2/3] gitweb: Create Gitweb::Request module Pavan Kumar Sunkara
2010-06-03 13:55 ` [PATCH 3/3] git-instaweb: Add support for --reuse-config using gitconfig Pavan Kumar Sunkara
2010-06-03 15:20 ` [PATCH GSoC 1/3] gitweb: Create Gitweb::Config module Petr Baudis
2010-06-03 15:54 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2010-06-03 16:59 ` Jakub Narebski
2010-06-03 17:04 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2010-06-03 15:55 ` Jakub Narebski
2010-06-03 16:06 ` Petr Baudis
2010-06-03 16:11 ` Pavan Kumar Sunkara
2010-06-03 18:43 ` Jakub Narebski [this message]
2010-06-03 18:50 ` Pavan Kumar Sunkara
2010-06-03 16:00 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201006032043.14071.jnareb@gmail.com \
--to=jnareb@gmail.com \
--cc=chriscool@tuxfamily.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pasky@suse.cz \
--cc=pavan.sss1991@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).