From: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Joey Hess <joey@kitenet.net>,
git@vger.kernel.org, 554682@bugs.debian.org,
Adam Brewster <adambrewster@gmail.com>,
Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] bundle: use libified rev-list --boundary
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 15:34:51 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100630203451.GC23400@burratino> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7vtyok5rpl.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> writes:
>> The revision walker produces structured output, which should be a
>> little easier to work with than the text from rev-list.
>
> Hmm, doesn't it negatively affect later traversal you would need to do if
> you smudged the flag bits by running revision traversal like this?
I imagine so. I fear this would be the first git command to use the
revision walker twice, and I am not sure whether we can really make that
work.
The revision walker uses object flags for the following purposes:
- marking objects uninteresting/SYMMETRIC_LEFT. Luckily for us, if
an object is uninteresting or SYMMETRIC_LEFT for the first
--boundary walk, it will be likewise for pack-objects, too.
- history simplification (TREESAME), --cherry-pick (SHOWN),
--merge (SYMMETRIC_LEFT). There are already other reasons to
disallow these features for bundle.
- add_parents_to_list (ADDED, SEEN). This one is really worrisome;
should we walk through again to throw away the added parents?
Should there be a pass through all revisions to clear the ADDED
bit?
I’ll figure out a one-pass solution. :(
Jonathan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-30 20:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-19 0:26 bug: git-bundle create foo --stdin -> segfault Joey Hess
2010-01-19 23:52 ` Johannes Schindelin
2010-04-19 7:14 ` [PATCH 0/2] test bundle --stdin, fix objects_array_remove_duplicates() Jonathan Nieder
2010-04-19 8:03 ` [PATCH 1/2] t5704 (bundle): add tests for bundle --stdin Jonathan Nieder
2010-04-19 8:03 ` [PATCH 2/2] fix "bundle --stdin" segfault Jonathan Nieder
2010-04-20 5:16 ` [PATCH 0/2] test bundle --stdin, fix objects_array_remove_duplicates() Junio C Hamano
2010-06-26 6:17 ` [RFC/PATCH 0/8] Re: bug: git-bundle create foo --stdin -> segfault Jonathan Nieder
2010-06-26 6:19 ` [PATCH 1/8] bundle: split basis discovery into its own function Jonathan Nieder
2010-06-26 6:20 ` [PATCH 2/8] bundle: use libified rev-list --boundary Jonathan Nieder
2010-06-30 17:57 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-06-30 20:34 ` Jonathan Nieder [this message]
2010-06-26 6:20 ` [PATCH 3/8] bundle: give list_prerequisites() loop body its own function Jonathan Nieder
2010-06-30 18:04 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-06-30 20:37 ` Jonathan Nieder
2010-06-26 6:21 ` [PATCH 4/8] bundle: split table of contents output into " Jonathan Nieder
2010-06-26 6:22 ` [PATCH 5/8] bundle: reuse setup_revisions result Jonathan Nieder
2010-06-26 6:28 ` [PATCH 6/8] Fix bundle --stdin Jonathan Nieder
2010-06-26 6:29 ` [RFC/PATCH 7/8] bundle: Keep names of basis refs after discovery Jonathan Nieder
2010-06-26 6:31 ` [PATCH 8/8] bundle_create: Do not exit when given no revs to bundle Jonathan Nieder
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100630203451.GC23400@burratino \
--to=jrnieder@gmail.com \
--cc=554682@bugs.debian.org \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=adambrewster@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=joey@kitenet.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).