From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Finn Arne Gangstad Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] Introduce "double conversion during merge" more gradually Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2010 20:57:12 +0200 Message-ID: <20100701185712.GA22421@pvv.org> References: <3ae294ef30c3539da47d101bc39638e63721eb0e.1277974452.git.eyvind.bernhardsen@gmail.com> <4C2C6BC5.1030905@viscovery.net> <7v630z41ao.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Eyvind Bernhardsen , Junio C Hamano , Johannes Sixt , "git@vger.kernel.orgList" To: Jakub Narebski X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Jul 01 20:57:35 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OUOx2-0001Ss-RY for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 20:57:33 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755326Ab0GAS5X (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Jul 2010 14:57:23 -0400 Received: from decibel.pvv.ntnu.no ([129.241.210.179]:44553 "EHLO decibel.pvv.ntnu.no" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754612Ab0GAS5W (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Jul 2010 14:57:22 -0400 Received: from finnag by decibel.pvv.ntnu.no with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OUOwi-0005qP-HU; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 20:57:12 +0200 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 10:05:17AM -0700, Jakub Narebski wrote: > Eyvind Bernhardsen writes: > > On 1. juli 2010, at 18:25, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > > Johannes Sixt writes: > > >> Am 7/1/2010 11:09, schrieb Eyvind Bernhardsen: > >>> > >>>> +core.mergePrefilter:: > [...] > >> > >> Somehow to me "prefilter" does not sound to convey what really is going on > >> here, though. > > > > "Doubleconvert" doesn't really mean anything either though, and > > "convert" and "normalise" are too generic. I think the problem is > > that there's no existing name for what convert.c does. > > > > I chose "filter" because of the filter property; the crlf and ident > > things can be regarded as built-in filters. -- Eyvind > > What about `merge.renormalize' ;-) ? Best so far! Or what about "merge.canonicalize"? Sorry for bikeshedding :) - Finn Arne