git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Shawn O. Pearce" <spearce@spearce.org>
To: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, gitster@pobox.com, agladysh@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 5/5] fast-import: Fix minor data-loss issue with directories becoming symlinks
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 13:19:35 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100706201935.GB19476@spearce.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimrD1LOZBb0YyzlrKgTc7bGWTxdf05cpwPR6WSw@mail.gmail.com>

Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 1:34 PM, Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> wrote:
> > newren@gmail.com wrote:
> >> From: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
> >>
> >> When fast-export runs across a directory changing to a symlink, it will
> >> output the changes in the form
> >> ?? M 120000 :239821 dir-changing-to-symlink
> >> ?? D dir-changing-to-symlink/filename1
> >> When fast-import sees the first line, it deletes the directory named
> >> dir-changing-to-symlink (and any files below it) and creates a symlink in
> >> its place. ??When fast-import came across the second line, it was previously
> >> trying to remove the file and relevant leading directories in
> >> tree_content_remove(), and as a side effect it would delete the symlink
> >> that was just created. ??This resulted in the symlink silently missing from
> >> the resulting repository.
> >
> > Ugh.
> >
> > I'm not against making the input parser more robust, but this is
> > a violation of the stream format from fast-export. ??The stream is
> > incremental, a command like 'M' takes place immediately. ??It is
> > wrong for a frontend to output 'M foo', then 'D foo/bar'.
> >
> > IMHO, if fast-export is doing what you say above, the bug lies in
> > fast-export, and therefore the fix should too.
> 
> Okay, I'll fix up fast-export.  Do you want me to drop this
> fast-import patch, or does it still make sense as an extra robustness
> check?

It probably makes sense to still do this in fast-import, deleting
something that doesn't exist is probably OK, its still going to
be deleted in the end anyway.

-- 
Shawn.

      reply	other threads:[~2010-07-06 20:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-07-06 18:51 [PATCHv2 0/5] D/F conflict fixes newren
2010-07-06 18:51 ` [PATCHv2 1/5] Add additional testcases for D/F conflicts newren
2010-07-06 18:51 ` [PATCHv2 2/5] Add a rename + D/F conflict testcase newren
2010-07-06 18:51 ` [PATCHv2 3/5] merge-recursive: Fix D/F conflicts newren
2010-07-06 18:51 ` [PATCHv2 4/5] merge_recursive: Fix renames across paths below " newren
2010-07-06 18:51 ` [PATCHv2 5/5] fast-import: Fix minor data-loss issue with directories becoming symlinks newren
2010-07-06 19:34   ` Shawn O. Pearce
2010-07-06 19:48     ` Elijah Newren
2010-07-06 20:19       ` Shawn O. Pearce [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100706201935.GB19476@spearce.org \
    --to=spearce@spearce.org \
    --cc=agladysh@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=newren@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).