From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ramkumar Ramachandra Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] Get svnrdump merged into git.git Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 13:26:20 +0200 Message-ID: <20100714112620.GC3496@debian> References: <1279064176-6645-1-git-send-email-artagnon@gmail.com> <20100713235825.GC12639@debian> <20100714001530.GB2308@burratino> <20100714002235.GF12639@debian> <20100714002843.GC2308@burratino> <20100714004959.GG12639@debian> <20100714070323.GB25630@jack.stsp.name> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Jonathan Nieder , Git Mailing List , David Michael Barr , Sverre Rabbelier , avarab@gmail.com, Daniel Shahaf , Bert Huijben , Junio C Hamano , Eric Wong , Will Palmer , Greg Stein To: Stefan Sperling X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Jul 14 13:24:42 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OZ04v-0001wo-9u for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 13:24:41 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753648Ab0GNLYg (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jul 2010 07:24:36 -0400 Received: from mail-ey0-f174.google.com ([209.85.215.174]:48025 "EHLO mail-ey0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753371Ab0GNLYf (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jul 2010 07:24:35 -0400 Received: by eya25 with SMTP id 25so970341eya.19 for ; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 04:24:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:cc:subject :message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=96c0aDAep8zR6E63Z1mKLU5R1KGVHCpeNaT4aVOLgZg=; b=XujnHkERFQqczH+qYaVX6phvTtxvUJ1W2MTJxvqWHkmHQVXhtlSn+PF9l6OIFni37l RMBfPTzVEj/q7d4X9OJL3/2qSVxRxnuL5nFmeK/7JJtxtilmXXSup1JdOeboykcPBZxi mCV20eOXz9k586l45cxa2EXFokzNTJESNjBbo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=NxpPqRKvB8cJ4LC/MOkApv4xaDmB9kFsG4XA7F7adbLtHZEMNCcGIE0etYuNIE7tpP cPfjNWp3NEFRtG6y1yVi/KDGuK24siJHVmw19smmvkwdqe3O9WgGBB+6fQoaderXx4y9 e9o7b3LXq8qqaKYKf/qz8OU/FnrklxDsf9mMI= Received: by 10.213.25.130 with SMTP id z2mr1152066ebb.42.1279106673918; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 04:24:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debian (nat-wireless.itu.dk [130.226.142.243]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v59sm56395699eeh.4.2010.07.14.04.24.31 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 14 Jul 2010 04:24:32 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100714070323.GB25630@jack.stsp.name> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi Stefan, Stefan Sperling writes: > Git devs will want a version of svnrdump that compiles against > the 1.6.x libraries. We'll want a version that compiles against > the trunk (so we can release it with 1.7). > > So depending on which APIs svnrdump is using, it's likely that > you'll have to maintain 2 slightly differing versions anyway, > until 1.7 is released. (The current ETA for 1.7 is autumn, BTW). Right, that's alright. I'll just have a commit that I'll keep `rebase --onto`ing to have the 1.6-specific changes. > > Also, could the Subversion > > people confirm that licensing isn't an issue? > > I didn't catch any licensing discussion. What's the issue? I guess there's no issue then- sorry, I know close to nothing about licensing. -- Ram